Tight running times for minimum ℓ_q-norm load balancing: beyond exponential dependencies on 1/ε
share
We consider a classical scheduling problem on m identical machines. For an arbitrary constant q>1, the aim is to assign jobs to machines such that ∑_i=1^m C_i^q is minimized, where C_i is the total processing time of jobs assigned to machine i. It is well known that this problem is strongly NP-hard. Under mild assumptions, the running time of an (1+ϵ)-approximation algorithm for a strongly NP-hard problem cannot be polynomial on 1/ϵ, unless P=NP. For most problems in the literature, this translates into algorithms with running time at least as large as 2^Ω(1/ε)+n^O(1). For the natural scheduling problem above, we establish the existence of an algorithm which violates this threshold. More precisely, we design a PTAS that runs in 2^Õ(√(1/ϵ))+n^O(1) time. This result is in sharp contrast to the closely related minimum makespan variant, where an exponential lower bound is known under the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). We complement our result with an essentially matching lower bound on the running time, showing that our algorithm is best-possible under ETH. The lower bound proof exploits new number-theoretical constructions for variants of progression-free sets, which might be of independent interest. Furthermore, we provide a fine-grained characterization on the running time of a PTAS for this problem depending on the relation between ϵ and the number of machines m. More precisely, our lower bound only holds when m=Θ(√(1/ϵ)). Better algorithms, that go beyond the lower bound, exist for other values of m. In particular, there even exists an algorithm with running time polynomial in 1/ϵ if we restrict ourselves to instances with m=Ω(1/ϵlog^21/ϵ).
READ FULL TEXT
