On the relation between dependency distance, crossing dependencies, and parsing. Comment on "Dependency distance: a new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages"

05/27/2017
by   Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez, et al.
0

Liu et al. (2017) provide a comprehensive account of research on dependency distance in human languages. While the article is a very rich and useful report on this complex subject, here I will expand on a few specific issues where research in computational linguistics (specifically natural language processing) can inform DDM research, and vice versa. These aspects have not been explored much in the article by Liu et al. or elsewhere, probably due to the little overlap between both research communities, but they may provide interesting insights for improving our understanding of the evolution of human languages, the mechanisms by which the brain processes and understands language, and the construction of effective computer systems to achieve this goal.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
09/03/2015

The influence of Chunking on Dependency Crossing and Distance

This paper hypothesizes that chunking plays important role in reducing d...
research
09/09/2015

Liberating language research from dogmas of the 20th century

A commentary on the article "Large-scale evidence of dependency length m...
research
09/15/2015

Dependency length minimization: Puzzles and Promises

In the recent issue of PNAS, Futrell et al. claims that their study of 3...
research
10/01/2015

Response to Liu, Xu, and Liang (2015) and Ferrer-i-Cancho and Gómez-Rodríguez (2015) on Dependency Length Minimization

We address recent criticisms (Liu et al., 2015; Ferrer-i-Cancho and Góme...
research
01/10/2022

Informal Persian Universal Dependency Treebank

This paper presents the phonological, morphological, and syntactic disti...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset