Response to Liu, Xu, and Liang (2015) and Ferrer-i-Cancho and Gómez-Rodríguez (2015) on Dependency Length Minimization

10/01/2015
by   Richard Futrell, et al.
0

We address recent criticisms (Liu et al., 2015; Ferrer-i-Cancho and Gómez-Rodríguez, 2015) of our work on empirical evidence of dependency length minimization across languages (Futrell et al., 2015). First, we acknowledge error in failing to acknowledge Liu (2008)'s previous work on corpora of 20 languages with similar aims. A correction will appear in PNAS. Nevertheless, we argue that our work provides novel, strong evidence for dependency length minimization as a universal quantitative property of languages, beyond this previous work, because it provides baselines which focus on word order preferences. Second, we argue that our choices of baselines were appropriate because they control for alternative theories.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
09/09/2015

Liberating language research from dogmas of the 20th century

A commentary on the article "Large-scale evidence of dependency length m...
research
09/15/2015

Dependency length minimization: Puzzles and Promises

In the recent issue of PNAS, Futrell et al. claims that their study of 3...
research
04/22/2023

A bounded rationality account of dependency length minimization in Hindi

The principle of DEPENDENCY LENGTH MINIMIZATION, which seeks to keep syn...
research
09/03/2015

The influence of Chunking on Dependency Crossing and Distance

This paper hypothesizes that chunking plays important role in reducing d...
research
09/25/2022

AI, Opacity, and Personal Autonomy

Advancements in machine learning have fuelled the popularity of using AI...
research
03/10/2020

Voter Verification of BMD Ballots Is a Two-Part Question: Can They? Mostly, They Can. Do They? Mostly, They Don't

The question of whether or not voters actually verify ballots produced b...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset