Metacognitive Agents for Ethical Decision Support: Conceptual Model and Research Roadmap

02/24/2022
by   Catriona M. Kennedy, et al.
0

An ethical value-action gap exists when there is a discrepancy between intentions and actions. This discrepancy may be caused by social and structural obstacles as well as cognitive biases. Computational models of cognition and affect can provide insights into the value-action gap and how it can be reduced. In particular, metacognition ("thinking about thinking") plays an important role in many of these models as a mechanism for self-regulation and reasoning about mental attitudes. This paper outlines a roadmap for translating cognitive-affective models into assistant agents to help make value-aligned decisions.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
09/07/2021

Have a break from making decisions, have a MARS: The Multi-valued Action Reasoning System

The Multi-valued Action Reasoning System (MARS) is an automated value-ba...
research
12/21/2020

Taking Principles Seriously: A Hybrid Approach to Value Alignment

An important step in the development of value alignment (VA) systems in ...
research
02/13/2023

Minding rights: Mapping ethical and legal foundations of 'neurorights'

The rise of neurotechnologies, especially in combination with AI-based m...
research
11/02/2019

Ethical Dilemmas of Strategic Coalitions

A coalition of agents, or a single agent, has an ethical dilemma between...
research
10/16/2021

Modelling Behaviour Change using Cognitive Agent Simulations

In health psychology, Behaviour Change Theories(BCTs) play an important ...
research
03/12/2018

Taking Turing by Surprise? Designing Digital Computers for morally-loaded contexts

There is much to learn from what Turing hastily dismissed as Lady Lovela...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset