Legal Extractive Summarization of U.S. Court Opinions

05/15/2023
by   Emmanuel Bauer, et al.
0

This paper tackles the task of legal extractive summarization using a dataset of 430K U.S. court opinions with key passages annotated. According to automated summary quality metrics, the reinforcement-learning-based MemSum model is best and even out-performs transformer-based models. In turn, expert human evaluation shows that MemSum summaries effectively capture the key points of lengthy court opinions. Motivated by these results, we open-source our models to the general public. This represents progress towards democratizing law and making U.S. court opinions more accessible to the general public.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
06/01/2023

Towards Argument-Aware Abstractive Summarization of Long Legal Opinions with Summary Reranking

We propose a simple approach for the abstractive summarization of long l...
research
08/23/2021

VerbCL: A Dataset of Verbatim Quotes for Highlight Extraction in Case Law

Citing legal opinions is a key part of legal argumentation, an expert ta...
research
05/17/2022

An Evaluation Framework for Legal Document Summarization

A law practitioner has to go through numerous lengthy legal case proceed...
research
07/04/2023

Racial Bias Trends in the Text of US Legal Opinions

Although there is widespread recognition of racial bias in US law, it is...
research
10/22/2022

Extractive Summarization of Legal Decisions using Multi-task Learning and Maximal Marginal Relevance

Summarizing legal decisions requires the expertise of law practitioners,...
research
09/05/2019

Informative and Controllable Opinion Summarization

Opinion summarization is the task of automatically generating summaries ...
research
11/05/2022

The Legal Argument Reasoning Task in Civil Procedure

We present a new NLP task and dataset from the domain of the U.S. civil ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset