Improved Detection Strategies for Nonlinear Frequency-Division Multiplexing

05/05/2018 ∙ by Stella Civelli, et al. ∙ Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna 0

Two novel detection strategies for nonlinear Fourier transform-based transmission schemes are proposed. We show, through numerical simulations, that both strategies achieve a good performance improvement (up to 3 dB and 5 dB) with respect to conventional detection, respectively without or only moderately increasing the computational complexity of the receiver.



There are no comments yet.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

This week in AI

Get the week's most popular data science and artificial intelligence research sent straight to your inbox every Saturday.


  • [1]

    A. Hasegawa and T. Nyu, “Eigenvalue communication,”

    J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 395–399, Mar. 1993.
  • [2] S. K. Turitsyn, J. E. Prilepsky, S. T. Le, S. Wahls, L. L. Frumin, M. Kamalian, and S. A. Derevyanko, “Nonlinear Fourier transform for optical data processing and transmission: advances and perspectives,” Optica, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 307–322, 2017.
  • [3] M. I. Yousefi and F. R. Kschischang, “Information transmission using the nonlinear Fourier transform, Parts I–III,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 4312–4369, Jul. 2014.
  • [4] M. I. Yousefi and X. Yangzhang, “Linear and nonlinear frequency-division multiplexing,” European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC 2016), Proceedings of, 2016.
  • [5] M. Kamalian, J. E. Prilepsky, S. T. Le, and S. K. Turitsyn, “Periodic nonlinear Fourier transform for fiber-optic communication, part ii: Eigenvalue communication,” Opt. Express, vol. 24, no. 16, pp. 18 370–18 381, 2016.
  • [6] S. T. Le, J. E. Prilepsky, and S. K. Turitsyn, “Nonlinear inverse synthesis for high spectral efficiency transmission in optical fibers,” Opt. Express, vol. 22, no. 22, pp. 26 720–26 741, 2014.
  • [7] S. T. Le, V. Aref, and H. Buelow, “Nonlinear signal multiplexing for communication beyond the kerr nonlinearity limit,” Nature Photonics, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 570, 2017.
  • [8] S. Civelli, E. Forestieri, and M. Secondini, “Why noise and dispersion may seriously hamper nonlinear frequency-division multiplexing,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 29, no. 16, pp. 1332–1335, August 2017.
  • [9] V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, “Exact theory of two-dimensional self-focusing and one-dimensional self-modulation of waves in nonlinear media,” Sov. Phys.-JETP, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 62–69, 1972.
  • [10] S. Civelli, E. Forestieri, and M. Secondini, “A novel detection strategy for nonlinear frequency-division multiplexing,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conference.   Optical Society of America, 2018, pp. W1G–5.
  • [11] ——, “Decision-feedback detection strategy for nonlinear frequency-division multiplexing,” Opt. Express, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 12 057–12 071, Apr 2018. [Online]. Available:
  • [12] S. A. Derevyanko, J. E. Prilepsky, and S. K. Turitsyn, “Capacity estimates for optical transmission based on the nonlinear Fourier transform,” Nature Communications, 2016. [Online]. Available:
  • [13] I. Tavakkolnia and M. Safari, “Dispersion pre-compensation for NFT-based optical fiber communication systems,” in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, OSA Technical Digest, 2016.
  • [14] S. Civelli, L. Barletti, and M. Secondini, “Numerical methods for the inverse nonlinear Fourier transform,” in Proc. Tyrrhenian Int. Workshop Digital Communications (TIWDC), Florence, Italy, Sep. 2015, pp. 13–16.