"I ain't tellin' white folks nuthin": A quantitative exploration of the race-related problem of candour in the WPA slave narratives

05/01/2018
by   Soumya Kambhampati, et al.
0

From 1936-38, the Works Progress Administration interviewed thousands of former slaves about their life experiences. While these interviews are crucial to understanding the "peculiar institution" from the standpoint of the slave himself, issues relating to bias cloud analyses of these interviews. The problem I investigate is the problem of candour in the WPA slave narratives: it is widely held in the historical community that the strict racial caste system of the Deep South compelled black ex-slaves to tell white interviewers what they thought they wanted to hear, suggesting that there was a significant difference candour depending on whether their interviewer was white or black. In this work, I attempt to quantitatively characterise this race-related problem of candour. Prior work has either been of an impressionistic, qualitative nature, or utilised exceedingly simple quantitative methodology. In contrast, I use more sophisticated statistical methods: in particular word frequency and sentiment analysis and comparative topic modelling with LDA to try and identify differences in the content and sentiment expressed by ex-slaves in front of white interviewers versus black interviewers. While my sentiment analysis methodology was ultimately unsuccessful due to the complexity of the task, my word frequency analysis and comparative topic modelling methods both showed strong evidence that the content expressed in front of white interviewers was different from that of black interviewers. In particular, I found that the ex-slaves spoke much more about unfavourable aspects of slavery like whipping and slave patrollers in front of interviewers of their own race. I hope that my more-sophisticated statistical methodology helps improve the robustness of the argument for the existence of this problem of candour in the slave narratives, which some would seek to deny for revisionist purposes.

READ FULL TEXT

page 21

page 22

research
02/16/2021

Could you become more credible by being White? Assessing Impact of Race on Credibility with Deepfakes

Computer mediated conversations (e.g., videoconferencing) is now the new...
research
02/04/2020

Do I Look Like a Criminal? Examining how Race Presentation Impacts Human Judgement of Recidivism

Understanding how racial information impacts human decision making in on...
research
11/24/2020

Unequal Representations: Analyzing Intersectional Biases in Word Embeddings Using Representational Similarity Analysis

We present a new approach for detecting human-like social biases in word...
research
08/13/2022

A Study of Demographic Bias in CNN-based Brain MR Segmentation

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are increasingly being used to auto...
research
06/09/2023

Causality between Sentiment and Cryptocurrency Prices

This study investigates the relationship between narratives conveyed thr...
research
08/24/2016

Semantic descriptions of 24 evaluational adjectives, for application in sentiment analysis

We apply the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) approach (Goddard and W...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset