Log In Sign Up

Human-competitive Patches in Automatic Program Repair with Repairnator

by   Martin Monperrus, et al.

Repairnator is a bot. It constantly monitors software bugs discovered during continuous integration of open-source software and tries to fix them automatically. If it succeeds to synthesize a valid patch, Repairnator proposes the patch to the human developers, disguised under a fake human identity. To date, Repairnator has been able to produce 5 patches that were accepted by the human developers and permanently merged in the code base. This is a milestone for human-competitiveness in software engineering research on automatic program repair.


page 1

page 2

page 3


Repairnator patches programs automatically

Repairnator is a bot. It constantly monitors software bugs discovered du...

How to Design a Program Repair Bot? Insights from the Repairnator Project

Program repair research has made tremendous progress over the last few y...

Automatic Software Repair: a Bibliography

This article presents a survey on automatic software repair. Automatic s...

Characterizing Developer Use of Automatically Generated Patches

We present a study that characterizes the way developers use automatical...

FlexiRepair: Transparent Program Repair with Generic Patches

Template-based program repair research is in need for a common ground to...

Explainable Software Bot Contributions: Case Study of Automated Bug Fixes

In a software project, esp. in open-source, a contribution is a valuable...

Code Repositories


Software development bot that automatically repairs build failures on Travis Continuous Integration. Join the bot revolution! :star2::robot::star2::revolving_hearts:

view repo


  • [1] J. R. Koza.

    Human-competitive Results Produced by Genetic Programming.

    Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 11(3-4):251–284, 2010.
  • [2] C. Lebeuf, M. D. Storey, and A. Zagalsky. Software bots. IEEE Software, 35:18–23, 2018.
  • [3] M. Martinez, T. Durieux, R. Sommerard, J. Xuan, and M. Monperrus. Automatic Repair of Real Bugs in Java: a Large-scale Experiment on the Defects4j Dataset. Empirical Software Engineering, pages 1–29, 2016.
  • [4] M. Monperrus. Automatic Software Repair : a Bibliography. ACM Computing Surveys, 2017.
  • [5] A. Murgia, D. Janssens, S. Demeyer, and B. Vasilescu. Among the machines: Human-bot interaction on social q&a websites. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1272–1279. ACM, 2016.
  • [6] E. K. Smith, E. T. Barr, C. Le Goues, and Y. Brun. Is the cure worse than the disease? overfitting in automated program repair. In Proceedings of the 2015 10th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering, pages 532–543, 2015.
  • [7] S. Urli, Z. Yu, L. Seinturier, and M. Monperrus. How to Design a Program Repair Bot? Insights from the Repairnator Project. In ICSE 2018 - 40th International Conference on Software Engineering, Track Software Engineering in Practice, 2018.
  • [8] C. Vassallo, G. Schermann, F. Zampetti, D. Romano, P. Leitner, A. Zaidman, M. Di Penta, and S. Panichella. A Tale of CI Build Failures: An Open-source and a Financial Organization Perspective. In International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution, 2017.