Confounding Equivalence in Causal Inference

03/15/2012
by   Judea Pearl, et al.
0

The paper provides a simple test for deciding, from a given causal diagram, whether two sets of variables have the same bias-reducing potential under adjustment. The test requires that one of the following two conditions holds: either (1) both sets are admissible (i.e., satisfy the back-door criterion) or (2) the Markov boundaries surrounding the manipulated variable(s) are identical in both sets. Applications to covariate selection and model testing are discussed.

READ FULL TEXT
research
05/26/2023

On efficient covariate adjustment selection in causal effect estimation

In order to achieve unbiased and efficient estimators of causal effects ...
research
07/02/2019

Adjustment Criteria for Recovering Causal Effects from Missing Data

Confounding bias, missing data, and selection bias are three common obst...
research
02/14/2012

Adjustment Criteria in Causal Diagrams: An Algorithmic Perspective

Identifying and controlling bias is a key problem in empirical sciences....
research
10/11/2022

Finding and Listing Front-door Adjustment Sets

Identifying the effects of new interventions from data is a significant ...
research
11/13/2017

On the boundary between qualitative and quantitative methods for causal inference

We consider how to quantify the causal effect from a random variable to ...
research
09/12/2023

Confounder selection via iterative graph expansion

Confounder selection, namely choosing a set of covariates to control for...
research
05/21/2019

Slamming the sham: A Bayesian model for adaptive adjustment with noisy control data

It is not always clear how to adjust for control data in causal inferenc...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset