Comment on "Open is not forever: a study of vanished open access journals"

09/16/2020
by   Matan Shelomi, et al.
0

We comment on a recent article by Laakso et al. (arXiv:2008.11933 [cs.DL]), in which the disappearance of 176 open access journals from the Internet is noted. We argue that one reason these journals may have vanished is that they were predatory journals. The de-listing of predators from the Directory of Open Access Journals in 2014 and the abundance of predatory journals and awareness thereof in North America parsimoniously explain the temporal and geographic patterns Laakso et al. observed.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
08/03/2018

Remarks on an article by Rabern et al

We show that conjecture 15 in the article by Rabern et al. is wrong, and...
research
04/30/2019

The State of Open Access in Germany: An Analysis of the Publication Output of German Universities

Starting with the Berlin declaration in 2003, Open Access (OA) publishin...
research
03/13/2019

Rejoinder: "Gene Hunting with Hidden Markov Model Knockoffs"

In this paper we deepen and enlarge the reflection on the possible advan...
research
12/08/2021

Deep Learning and Mathematical Intuition: A Review of (Davies et al. 2021)

A recent paper by Davies et al (2021) describes how deep learning (DL) t...
research
09/25/2018

Quantitative bisimulations using coreflections and open morphisms

We investigate a canonical way of defining bisimilarity of systems when ...
research
05/07/2019

Code Design Principles for Ultra-Reliable Random Access with Preassigned Patterns

We study medium access control layer random access under the assumption ...
research
01/28/2022

Discriminating Defense Against DDoS Attacks; a Novel Approach

A recent paper (circa 2020) by Osterwile et al., entitled "21 Years of D...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset