Blinded sample size re-estimation in equivalence testing

08/13/2019
by   Ekkehard Glimm, et al.
0

This paper investigates type I error violations that occur when blinded sample size reviews are applied in equivalence testing. We give a derivation which explains why such violations are more pronounced in equivalence testing than in the case of superiority testing. In addition, the amount of type I error inflation is quantified by simulation as well as by some theoretical considerations. Non-negligible type I error violations arise when blinded interim re-assessments of sample sizes are performed particularly if sample sizes are small, but within the range of what is practically relevant.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
06/15/2023

Fast Sample Size Determination for Bayesian Equivalence Tests

Equivalence testing allows one to conclude that two characteristics are ...
research
11/22/2020

Sample size calculation for the Andersen-Gill model comparing rates of recurrent events

Recurrent events arise frequently in biomedical research, where the subj...
research
04/03/2020

Equivalence testing for standardized effect sizes in linear regression

In this paper, we introduce equivalence testing procedures for standardi...
research
07/31/2019

Reward Testing Equivalences for Processes

May and must testing were introduced by De Nicola and Hennessy to define...
research
06/28/2020

A review of Bayesian perspectives on sample size derivation for confirmatory trials

Sample size derivation is a crucial element of the planning phase of any...
research
11/06/2012

Sample Size Planning for Classification Models

In biospectroscopy, suitably annotated and statistically independent sam...
research
04/24/2018

Differences of Type I error rates using SAS and SPSS for repeated measures designs

We examined Type I error rates of Multilevel Linear Models (MLM) and rep...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset