Written Justifications are Key to Aggregate Crowdsourced Forecasts

09/14/2021
by   Saketh Kotamraju, et al.
0

This paper demonstrates that aggregating crowdsourced forecasts benefits from modeling the written justifications provided by forecasters. Our experiments show that the majority and weighted vote baselines are competitive, and that the written justifications are beneficial to call a question throughout its life except in the last quarter. We also conduct an error analysis shedding light into the characteristics that make a justification unreliable.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
08/22/2023

Forecasting inflation using disaggregates and machine learning

This paper examines the effectiveness of several forecasting methods for...
research
06/08/2021

Do forecasts of bankruptcy cause bankruptcy? A machine learning sensitivity analysis

It is widely speculated that auditors' public forecasts of bankruptcy ar...
research
01/28/2022

Comparing trained and untrained probabilistic ensemble forecasts of COVID-19 cases and deaths in the United States

The U.S. COVID-19 Forecast Hub aggregates forecasts of the short-term bu...
research
03/27/2023

Properties of the reconciled distributions for Gaussian and count forecasts

Reconciliation enforces coherence between hierarchical forecasts, in ord...
research
04/05/2022

Aggregating human judgment probabilistic predictions of COVID-19 transmission, burden, and preventative measures

Aggregated human judgment forecasts for COVID-19 targets of public healt...
research
10/11/2019

Inundation Modeling in Data Scarce Regions

Flood forecasts are crucial for effective individual and governmental pr...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset