Why only Micro-F1? Class Weighting of Measures for Relation Classification

05/19/2022
by   David Harbecke, et al.
0

Relation classification models are conventionally evaluated using only a single measure, e.g., micro-F1, macro-F1 or AUC. In this work, we analyze weighting schemes, such as micro and macro, for imbalanced datasets. We introduce a framework for weighting schemes, where existing schemes are extremes, and two new intermediate schemes. We show that reporting results of different weighting schemes better highlights strengths and weaknesses of a model.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
12/13/2010

Inverse-Category-Frequency based supervised term weighting scheme for text categorization

Term weighting schemes often dominate the performance of many classifier...
research
12/18/2019

Spotting Macro- and Micro-expression Intervals in Long Video Sequences

This paper presents baseline results for the Third Facial Micro-Expressi...
research
07/05/2023

Claim Reserving via Inverse Probability Weighting: A Micro-Level Chain-Ladder Method

Claim reserving is primarily accomplished using macro-level models, with...
research
05/31/2021

LIIR at SemEval-2021 task 6: Detection of Persuasion Techniques In Texts and Images using CLIP features

We describe our approach for SemEval-2021 task 6 on detection of persuas...
research
11/08/2019

Macro F1 and Macro F1

The 'macro F1' metric is frequently used to evaluate binary, multi-class...
research
03/27/2013

Context-Dependent Similarity

Attribute weighting and differential weighting, two major mechanisms for...
research
05/26/2020

Uniformly accurate numerical schemes for a class of dissipative systems

We consider a class of relaxation problems mixing slow and fast variatio...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset