Why Majority Judgement is not yet the solution for political elections, but can help finding it

02/21/2023
by   Friedemann Kemm, et al.
0

Like many other voting systems, Majority Judgement suffers from the weaknesses of the underlying mathematical model: Elections as problem of choice or ranking. We show how the model can be enhanced to take into account the complete process starting from the whole set of persons having passive electoral rights and even the aspect of reelection. By a new view on abstentions from voting and an adaption of Majority Judgement with three grades, we are able to describe a complete process for an election that can be easily put into legislation and sets suitable incentives for politicians who want to be reelected.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 3

page 11

research
06/30/2018

Self-consistency of voting implies majority vote

Paper develops axiomatic characterization of the family of majority vote...
research
11/16/2018

Measuring Majority Power and Veto Power of Voting Rules

We study voting rules with respect to how they allow or limit a majority...
research
10/22/2019

Distributed Voting in Beep Model

In this paper, we propose two distributed algorithms, named Distributed ...
research
04/15/2021

A Note on Data Simulations for Voting by Evaluation

Voting rules based on evaluation inputs rather than preference orders ha...
research
04/16/2012

When majority voting fails: Comparing quality assurance methods for noisy human computation environment

Quality assurance remains a key topic in human computation research. Pri...
research
10/29/2016

Sparse Signal Recovery for Binary Compressed Sensing by Majority Voting Neural Networks

In this paper, we propose majority voting neural networks for sparse sig...
research
05/10/2022

Massive Enhanced Extracted Email Features Tailored for Cosine Distance

In this paper, the process of converting the Enron email dataset (the ve...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset