When Should a Decision Maker Ignore the Advice of a Decision Aid?

by   Paul E. Lehner, et al.

This paper argues that the principal difference between decision aids and most other types of information systems is the greater reliance of decision aids on fallible algorithms--algorithms that sometimes generate incorrect advice. It is shown that interactive problem solving with a decision aid that is based on a fallible algorithm can easily result in aided performance which is poorer than unaided performance, even if the algorithm, by itself, performs significantly better than the unaided decision maker. This suggests that unless certain conditions are satisfied, using a decision aid as an aid is counterproductive. Some conditions under which a decision aid is best used as an aid are derived.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

page 5

page 6

page 7

page 8


A Predictive Autonomous Decision Aid for Calibrating Human-Autonomy Reliance in Multi-Agent Task Assignment

In this work, we develop a game-theoretic modeling of the interaction be...

Maximal benefits and possible detrimental effects of binary decision aids

Binary decision aids, such as alerts, are a simple and widely used form ...

Open community platform for hearing aid algorithm research: open Master Hearing Aid (openMHA)

open Master Hearing Aid (openMHA) was developed and provided to the hear...

Conflict and Surprise: Heuristics for Model Revision

Any probabilistic model of a problem is based on assumptions which, if v...

A Target Classification Decision Aid

A submarine's sonar team is responsible for detecting, localising and cl...

A Representation of Uncertainty to Aid Insight into Decision Models

Many real world models can be characterized as weak, meaning that there ...

AID-Purifier: A Light Auxiliary Network for Boosting Adversarial Defense

We propose an AID-purifier that can boost the robustness of adversariall...