When "Better" is better than "Best"

10/31/2020
by   Ben Amiet, et al.
0

We consider two-player normal form games where each player has the same finite strategy set. The payoffs of each player are assumed to be i.i.d. random variables with a continuous distribution. We show that, with high probability, the better-response dynamics converge to pure Nash equilibrium whenever there is one, whereas best-response dynamics fails to converge, as it is trapped.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
09/26/2022

Best-Response dynamics in two-person random games with correlated payoffs

We consider finite two-player normal form games with random payoffs. Pla...
research
09/05/2022

Random Initialization Solves Shapley's Fictitious Play Counterexample

In 1964 Shapley devised a family of games for which fictitious play fail...
research
11/25/2020

Best response dynamics on random graphs

We consider evolutionary games on a population whose underlying topology...
research
08/12/2022

Three-Player Game Training Dynamics

This work explores three-player game training dynamics, under what condi...
research
07/15/2020

Efficiency of equilibria in random binary games

We consider normal-form games with n players and two strategies for each...
research
01/20/2023

Computing equilibria by minimizing exploitability with best-response ensembles

In this paper, we study the problem of computing an approximate Nash equ...
research
01/11/2021

Best-response dynamics in directed network games

We study public goods games played on networks with possibly non-recipro...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset