-
PRINCIPIA: a Decentralized Peer-Review Ecosystem
Peer review is a cornerstone of modern scientific endeavor. However, the...
08/20/2020 ∙ by Andrea Mambrini, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Mathematicians take a stand
We survey the reasons for the ongoing boycott of the publisher Elsevier....
04/05/2012 ∙ by Douglas N. Arnold, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Artificial intelligence in peer review: How can evolutionary computation support journal editors?
With the volume of manuscripts submitted for publication growing every y...
12/02/2017 ∙ by Maciej J. Mrowinski, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000 post-publication open peer review publishing model
This study examines whether there is any evidence of bias in two areas o...
11/08/2019 ∙ by Mike Thelwall, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review
Criteria are an essential component of any procedure for assessing merit...
08/04/2019 ∙ by Sven E. Hug, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Efficiency in managing peer-review of scientific manuscripts – editors' perspective
The purpose of this paper is to introduce a model for measuring the effi...
10/12/2019 ∙ by Olgica Nedic, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
A SUPER* Algorithm to Optimize Paper Bidding in Peer Review
A number of applications involve sequential arrival of users, and requir...
06/27/2020 ∙ by Tanner Fiez, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
What Constitutes Peer Review of Data: A survey of published peer review guidelines
04/07/2017 ∙ by Todd A Carpenter, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
Since a number of journals specifically focus on the review and publication of data sets, reviewing their policies seems an appropriate place to start in assessing what existing practice looks like in the 'real world' of reviewing and publishing data. This article outlines a study of the publicly available peer review policies of 39 scientific publications that publish data papers to discern which criteria are most and least frequently referenced. It also compares current practice with proposed criteria published in 2012.
READ FULL TEXT
Comments
There are no comments yet.