What Constitutes Peer Review of Data: A survey of published peer review guidelines

04/07/2017
by   Todd A Carpenter, et al.
0

Since a number of journals specifically focus on the review and publication of data sets, reviewing their policies seems an appropriate place to start in assessing what existing practice looks like in the 'real world' of reviewing and publishing data. This article outlines a study of the publicly available peer review policies of 39 scientific publications that publish data papers to discern which criteria are most and least frequently referenced. It also compares current practice with proposed criteria published in 2012.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
10/04/2022

PreprintMatch: a tool for preprint publication detection applied to analyze global inequities in scientific publishing

Preprints, versions of scientific manuscripts that precede peer review, ...
research
04/05/2012

Mathematicians take a stand

We survey the reasons for the ongoing boycott of the publisher Elsevier....
research
08/29/2021

Retracted papers by Iranian authors: Causes, journals, time lags, affiliations, collaborations

This study aims to analyze 343 retraction notices indexed in the Scopus ...
research
08/04/2019

Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review

Criteria are an essential component of any procedure for assessing merit...
research
12/02/2017

Artificial intelligence in peer review: How can evolutionary computation support journal editors?

With the volume of manuscripts submitted for publication growing every y...
research
06/27/2020

A SUPER* Algorithm to Optimize Paper Bidding in Peer Review

A number of applications involve sequential arrival of users, and requir...
research
08/20/2020

PRINCIPIA: a Decentralized Peer-Review Ecosystem

Peer review is a cornerstone of modern scientific endeavor. However, the...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset