Well-Founded Argumentation Semantics for Extended Logic Programming

07/10/2002
by   Ralf Schweimeier, et al.
0

This paper defines an argumentation semantics for extended logic programming and shows its equivalence to the well-founded semantics with explicit negation. We set up a general framework in which we extensively compare this semantics to other argumentation semantics, including those of Dung, and Prakken and Sartor. We present a general dialectical proof theory for these argumentation semantics.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/26/2021

Relational Argumentation Semantics

In this paper, we propose a fresh perspective on argumentation semantics...
research
12/14/2022

Many-valued Argumentation, Conditionals and a Probabilistic Semantics for Gradual Argumentation

In this paper we propose a general approach to define a many-valued pref...
research
07/15/2014

Abduction and Dialogical Proof in Argumentation and Logic Programming

We develop a model of abduction in abstract argumentation, where changes...
research
02/29/2016

Range-based argumentation semantics as 2-valued models

Characterizations of semi-stable and stage extensions in terms of 2-valu...
research
03/01/2012

The Equational Approach to CF2 Semantics

We introduce a family of new equational semantics for argumentation netw...
research
04/28/2014

Credulous and Skeptical Argument Games for Complete Semantics in Conflict Resolution based Argumentation

Argumentation is one of the most popular approaches of defining a non-mo...
research
04/18/2018

A General Account of Argumentation with Preferences

This paper builds on the recent ASPIC+ formalism, to develop a general f...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset