Weakness Makes Muller Delay Games Hard

03/07/2022
by   Sarah Winter, et al.
0

We show that solving delay games with winning conditions given by deterministic and nondeterministic weak Muller automata is 2EXPTIME-complete respectively 3EXPTIME-complete. Furthermore, doubly and triply exponential lookahead is necessary and sufficient to win such games. These results are the first that show that the succinctness of the automata types used to specify the winning conditions has an influence on the complexity of these problems.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
01/13/2020

Good-for-games ω-Pushdown Automata

We introduce good-for-games ω-pushdown automata (ω-GFG-PDA). These are a...
research
06/28/2019

The Complexity of Tiling Problems

In this document, we collected the most important complexity results of ...
research
05/31/2023

Strategies Resilient to Delay: Games under Delayed Control vs. Delay Games (full version)

We compare games under delayed control and delay games, two types of inf...
research
09/07/2017

Finite-state Strategies in Delay Games

What is a finite-state strategy in a delay game? We answer this surprisi...
research
11/16/2017

Game Characterization of Probabilistic Bisimilarity, and Applications to Pushdown Automata

We study the bisimilarity problem for probabilistic pushdown automata (p...
research
01/25/2020

Elementary Cellular Automata along with delay sensitivity can model communal riot dynamics

This work explores the potential of elementary cellular automata to mode...
research
12/19/2017

Automata Minimization: a Functorial Approach

In this paper we regard languages and their acceptors - such as determin...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset