Voter Perceptions of Trust in Risk-Limiting Audits

09/15/2021
by   Asmita Dalela, et al.
0

Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) are expected to strengthen the public confidence in the correctness of an election outcome. We hypothesize that this is not always the case, in part because for large margins between the winner and the runner-up, the number of ballots to be drawn can be so small that voters lose confidence. We conduct a user study with 105 participants resident in the US. Our findings confirm the hypothesis, showing that our study participants felt less confident when they were told the number of ballots audited for RLAs. We elaborate on our findings and propose recommendations for future use of RLAs.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
12/18/2021

A First Approach to Risk-Limiting Audits for Single Transferable Vote Elections

Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) are an increasingly important method for che...
research
03/10/2023

Explaining Model Confidence Using Counterfactuals

Displaying confidence scores in human-AI interaction has been shown to h...
research
01/26/2022

A Comparative User Study of Human Predictions in Algorithm-Supported Recidivism Risk Assessment

In this paper, we study the effects of using an algorithm-based risk ass...
research
01/10/2019

Auditing Indian Elections

Indian Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) will be fitted with printers th...
research
07/23/2021

RiLACS: Risk-Limiting Audits via Confidence Sequences

Accurately determining the outcome of an election is a complex task with...
research
02/17/2021

Auditing Hamiltonian Elections

Presidential primaries are a critical part of the United States Presiden...
research
12/06/2020

More style, less work: card-style data decrease risk-limiting audit sample sizes

U.S. elections rely heavily on computers such as voter registration data...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset