Very strong evidence in favor of quantum mechanics and against local hidden variables from a Bayesian analysis

08/21/2018
by   Yanwu Gu, et al.
0

The data of four recent experiments --- conducted in Delft, Vienna, Boulder, and Munich with the aim of refuting nonquantum hidden-variables alternatives to the quantum-mechanical description --- are evaluated from a Bayesian perspective of what constitutes evidence in statistical data. We find that each of the experiments provides strong, or very strong, evidence in favor of quantum mechanics and against the nonquantum alternatives. This Bayesian analysis supplements the previous non-Bayesian ones, which refuted the alternatives on the basis of small p-values, but could not support quantum mechanics.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
08/08/2021

Incompatibility between 't Hooft's and Wolfram's models of quantum mechanics

Stephen Wolfram and Gerard 't Hooft developed classical models of quantu...
research
08/20/2023

Quantization-based Optimization with Perspective of Quantum Mechanics

Statistical and stochastic analysis based on thermodynamics has been the...
research
08/04/2015

Factor Graphs for Quantum Probabilities

A factor-graph representation of quantum-mechanical probabilities (invol...
research
03/21/2020

A Quantum Vocal Theory of Sound

Concepts and formalism from acoustics are often used to exemplify quantu...
research
06/18/2021

The dihedral hidden subgroup problem

We give an exposition of the hidden subgroup problem for dihedral groups...
research
07/30/2018

Objective and Subjective Solomonoff Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics

Algorithmic probability has shown some promise in dealing with the proba...
research
11/07/2020

Contextuality: At the Borders of Paradox

Contextuality is a key feature of quantum mechanics. We present the shea...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset