Using Issues to Explain Legal Decisions

06/25/2021
by   Trevor Bench-Capon, et al.
0

The need to explain the output from Machine Learning systems designed to predict the outcomes of legal cases has led to a renewed interest in the explanations offered by traditional AI and Law systems, especially those using factor based reasoning and precedent cases. In this paper we consider what sort of explanations we should expect from such systems, with a particular focus on the structure that can be provided by the use of issues in cases.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
09/29/2020

Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) Amid the Advent of Autonomous AI Legal Reasoning

Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) is a longstanding and open topic in the ...
research
08/25/2020

Looking deeper into LIME

Interpretability of machine learning algorithm is a pressing need. Numer...
research
05/14/2021

Discovering the Rationale of Decisions: Experiments on Aligning Learning and Reasoning

In AI and law, systems that are designed for decision support should be ...
research
09/07/2022

Algorithmic Learning Foundations for Common Law

This paper looks at a common law legal system as a learning algorithm, m...
research
10/20/2022

Modelling and Explaining Legal Case-based Reasoners through Classifiers

This paper brings together two lines of research: factor-based models of...
research
07/24/2020

Memory networks for consumer protection:unfairness exposed

Recent work has demonstrated how data-driven AI methods can leverage con...
research
06/23/2022

Non-Determinism and the Lawlessness of ML Code

Legal literature on machine learning (ML) tends to focus on harms, and a...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset