User Sentiment as a Success Metric: Persistent Biases Under Full Randomization

06/26/2019
by   Ercan Yildiz, et al.
0

We study user sentiment (reported via optional surveys) as a metric for fully randomized A/B tests. Both user-level covariates and treatment assignment can impact response propensity. We propose a set of consistent estimators for the average and local treatment effects on treated and respondent users. We show that our problem can be mapped onto the intersection of the missing data problem and observational causal inference, and we identify conditions under which consistent estimators exist. We evaluate the performance of estimators via simulation studies and find that more complicated models do not necessarily provide superior performance.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
02/25/2018

Efficient nonparametric causal inference with missing exposure information

In this note we study identifiability and efficient estimation of causal...
research
05/10/2021

Causal Inference under Network Interference with Noise

Increasingly, there is a marked interest in estimating causal effects un...
research
08/04/2018

Improved Estimation of Average Treatment Effects on the Treated: Local Efficiency, Double Robustness, and Beyond

Estimation of average treatment effects on the treated (ATT) is an impor...
research
07/30/2019

On the estimation of average treatment effects with right-censored time to event outcome and competing risks

We are interested in the estimation of average treatment effects based o...
research
11/30/2021

Contrasting Identifying Assumptions of Average Causal Effects: Robustness and Semiparametric Efficiency

Semiparametric inference about average causal effects from observational...
research
08/16/2019

Counting Defiers

The LATE monotonicity assumption of Imbens and Angrist (1994) precludes ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset