Uncertainty and Incompleteness

03/27/2013
by   Piero P. Bonissone, et al.
0

Two major difficulties in using default logics are their intractability and the problem of selecting among multiple extensions. We propose an approach to these problems based on integrating nommonotonic reasoning with plausible reasoning based on triangular norms. A previously proposed system for reasoning with uncertainty (RUM) performs uncertain monotonic inferences on an acyclic graph. We have extended RUM to allow nommonotonic inferences and cycles within nonmonotonic rules. By restricting the size and complexity of the nommonotonic cycles we can still perform efficient inferences. Uncertainty measures provide a basis for deciding among multiple defaults. Different algorithms and heuristics for finding the optimal defaults are discussed.

READ FULL TEXT

page 3

page 4

page 5

page 9

research
09/10/2010

Complexity of Non-Monotonic Logics

Over the past few decades, non-monotonic reasoning has developed to be o...
research
11/15/2021

Bayesian modelling and computation utilising cycles in multiple network data

Modelling multiple network data is crucial for addressing a wide range o...
research
02/06/2013

Cost-Sharing in Bayesian Knowledge Bases

Bayesian knowledge bases (BKBs) are a generalization of Bayes networks a...
research
03/27/2013

An Application of Non-Monotonic Probabilistic Reasoning to Air Force Threat Correlation

Current approaches to expert systems' reasoning under uncertainty fail t...
research
02/13/2013

Uncertain Inferences and Uncertain Conclusions

Uncertainty may be taken to characterize inferences, their conclusions, ...
research
03/20/2013

Non-monotonic Reasoning and the Reversibility of Belief Change

Traditional approaches to non-monotonic reasoning fail to satisfy a numb...
research
10/11/2020

A Defeasible Calculus for Zetetic Agents

The study of defeasible reasoning unites epistemologists with those work...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset