Two sources of poor coverage of confidence intervals after model selection

11/06/2017
by   Paul Kabaila, et al.
0

We compare the following two sources of poor coverage of post-model-selection confidence intervals: the preliminary data-based model selection sometimes chooses the wrong model and the data used to choose the model is re-used for the construction of the confidence interval.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
03/05/2018

Expected length of post-model-selection confidence intervals conditional on polyhedral constraints

Valid inference after model selection is currently a very active area of...
research
11/25/2020

Hybrid Confidence Intervals for Informative Uniform Asymptotic Inference After Model Selection

I propose a new type of confidence interval for correct asymptotic infer...
research
05/24/2023

Post-model-selection prediction for GLM's

We give two prediction intervals (PI) for Generalized Linear Models that...
research
03/31/2023

Bootstrapping multiple systems estimates to account for model selection

Multiple systems estimation is a standard approach to quantifying hidden...
research
11/18/2020

Post-Selection Inference via Algorithmic Stability

Modern approaches to data analysis make extensive use of data-driven mod...
research
10/24/2022

Post-Selection Confidence Bounds for Prediction Performance

In machine learning, the selection of a promising model from a potential...
research
02/13/2018

When and when not to use optimal model averaging

Traditionally model averaging has been viewed as an alternative to model...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset