Two Representations for Iterative Non-prioritized Change

07/09/2002
by   Alexander Bochman, et al.
0

We address a general representation problem for belief change, and describe two interrelated representations for iterative non-prioritized change: a logical representation in terms of persistent epistemic states, and a constructive representation in terms of flocks of bases.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
02/17/2019

Iterated Belief Base Revision: A Dynamic Epistemic Logic Approach

AGM's belief revision is one of the main paradigms in the study of belie...
research
12/22/2019

Bringing Belief Base Change into Dynamic Epistemic Logic

AGM's belief revision is one of the main paradigms in the study of belie...
research
07/10/2002

Iterated revision and the axiom of recovery: a unified treatment via epistemic states

The axiom of recovery, while capturing a central intuition regarding bel...
research
06/14/2016

Impossibility in Belief Merging

With the aim of studying social properties of belief merging and having ...
research
10/30/2019

Belief revision and 3-valued logics: Characterization of 19,683 belief change operators

In most classical models of belief change, epistemic states are represen...
research
10/31/2022

Detecting an Intermittent Change of Unknown Duration

We address the problem of detecting a change that is not persistent but ...
research
09/16/2021

An Open Problem on Sparse Representations in Unions of Bases

We consider sparse representations of signals from redundant dictionarie...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset