Truthful Feedback for Sanctioning Reputation Mechanisms

03/15/2012
by   Jens Witkowski, et al.
0

For product rating environments, similar to that of Amazon Reviews, it has been shown that the truthful elicitation of feedback is possible through mechanisms which pay buyer reports contingent on the reports of other buyers. We study whether similar mechanisms can be designed for reputation mechanisms at online auction sites where the buyers' experiences are partially determined by a strategic seller. We show that this is impossible for the basic setting. However, introducing a small prior belief that the seller is a cooperative commitment player leads to a payment scheme with a truthful perfect Bayesian equilibrium.

READ FULL TEXT
research
05/08/2023

Discrete Two Player All-Pay Auction with Complete Information

We study discrete two player all-pay auction with complete information. ...
research
04/05/2018

An End-to-end Argument in Mechanism Design (Prior-independent Auctions for Budgeted Agents)

This paper considers prior-independent mechanism design, namely identify...
research
04/06/2020

Using Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in Auction Simulations

Game theory has been developed by scientists as a theory of strategic in...
research
02/14/2017

Agent Failures in All-Pay Auctions

All-pay auctions, a common mechanism for various human and agent interac...
research
02/08/2019

Expressive mechanisms for equitable rent division on a budget

We design envy-free mechanisms for the allocation of rooms and rent paym...
research
12/29/2018

Issues for Using Semantic Modeling to Represent Mechanisms

Mechanisms are a fundamental concept in many areas of science. Nonethele...
research
10/31/2011

Obtaining Reliable Feedback for Sanctioning Reputation Mechanisms

Reputation mechanisms offer an effective alternative to verification aut...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset