Tree-Like Justification Systems are Consistent

08/05/2022
by   Simon Marynissen, et al.
0

Justification theory is an abstract unifying formalism that captures semantics of various non-monotonic logics. One intriguing problem that has received significant attention is the consistency problem: under which conditions are justifications for a fact and justifications for its negation suitably related. Two variants of justification theory exist: one in which justifications are trees and one in which they are graphs. In this work we resolve the consistency problem once and for all for the tree-like setting by showing that all reasonable tree-like justification systems are consistent.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
08/04/2020

Exploiting Game Theory for Analysing Justifications

Justification theory is a unifying semantic framework. While it has its ...
research
06/15/2018

Morse Theory and an Impossibility Theorem for Graph Clustering

Kleinberg introduced three natural clustering properties, or axioms, and...
research
04/11/2020

Steps and Traces

In the theory of coalgebras, trace semantics can be defined in various d...
research
04/30/2010

Simple Type Theory as Framework for Combining Logics

Simple type theory is suited as framework for combining classical and no...
research
03/31/2016

A New Approach for Revising Logic Programs

Belief revision has been studied mainly with respect to background logic...
research
03/01/2020

An Algorithm for Consensus Trees

We consider the tree consensus problem, an important problem in bioinfor...
research
10/11/2017

Stream Graphs and Link Streams for the Modeling of Interactions over Time

Graph theory provides a language for studying the structure of relations...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset