Trading Off Voting Axioms for Privacy

07/14/2023
by   Zhechen Li, et al.
0

In this paper, we investigate tradeoffs among differential privacy (DP) and several important voting axioms: Pareto efficiency, SD-efficiency, PC-efficiency, Condorcet consistency, and Condorcet loser criterion. We provide upper and lower bounds on the two-way tradeoffs between DP and each axiom. We also provide upper and lower bounds on three-way tradeoffs among DP and every pairwise combination of all the axioms, showing that, while the axioms are compatible without DP, their upper bounds cannot be achieved simultaneously under DP. Our results illustrate the effect of DP on the satisfaction and compatibility of voting axioms.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
10/24/2022

Generalised Likelihood Ratio Testing Adversaries through the Differential Privacy Lens

Differential Privacy (DP) provides tight upper bounds on the capabilitie...
research
05/15/2018

How Private Is Your Voting? A Framework for Comparing the Privacy of Voting Mechanisms

Voting privacy has received a lot of attention across several research c...
research
08/20/2022

The Saddle-Point Accountant for Differential Privacy

We introduce a new differential privacy (DP) accountant called the saddl...
research
06/08/2023

Federated Linear Contextual Bandits with User-level Differential Privacy

This paper studies federated linear contextual bandits under the notion ...
research
11/23/2022

Private Multi-Winner Voting for Machine Learning

Private multi-winner voting is the task of revealing k-hot binary vector...
research
07/08/2023

Bounding data reconstruction attacks with the hypothesis testing interpretation of differential privacy

We explore Reconstruction Robustness (ReRo), which was recently proposed...
research
07/21/2023

Epsilon*: Privacy Metric for Machine Learning Models

We introduce Epsilon*, a new privacy metric for measuring the privacy ri...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset