Towards Reliable Evaluation of Road Network Reconstructions

11/28/2019
by   Leonardo Citraro, et al.
0

Existing performance measures rank delineation algorithms inconsistently, which makes it difficult to decide which one is best in any given situation. We show that these inconsistencies stem from design flaws that make the metrics insensitive to whole classes of errors. To provide more reliable evaluation, we design three new metrics that are far more consistent even though they use very different approaches to comparing ground-truth and reconstructed road networks. We use both synthetic and real data to demonstrate this and advocate the use of these corrected metrics as a tool to gauge future progress.

READ FULL TEXT
research
06/25/2021

The Effect of Ground Truth Accuracy on the Evaluation of Localization Systems

The ability to accurately evaluate the performance of location determina...
research
01/25/2021

A metric for evaluating 3D reconstruction and mapping performance with no ground truthing

It is not easy when evaluating 3D mapping performance because existing m...
research
12/30/2022

Informing selection of performance metrics for medical image segmentation evaluation using configurable synthetic errors

Machine learning-based segmentation in medical imaging is widely used in...
research
06/28/2017

Data-driven Natural Language Generation: Paving the Road to Success

We argue that there are currently two major bottlenecks to the commercia...
research
11/28/2022

Towards Reliable Item Sampling for Recommendation Evaluation

Since Rendle and Krichene argued that commonly used sampling-based evalu...
research
09/24/2018

Statistical Estimation of Malware Detection Metrics in the Absence of Ground Truth

The accurate measurement of security metrics is a critical research prob...
research
06/23/2021

Communication in Complex Networks

The investigation of properties of networks has many applications and is...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset