Towards Clarifying the Theory of the Deconfounder

03/10/2020
by   Yixin Wang, et al.
18

Wang and Blei (2019) studies multiple causal inference and proposes the deconfounder algorithm. The paper discusses theoretical requirements and presents empirical studies. Several refinements have been suggested around the theory of the deconfounder. Among these, Imai and Jiang clarified the assumption of "no unobserved single-cause confounders." Using their assumption, this paper clarifies the theory. Furthermore, Ogburn et al. (2020) proposes counterexamples to the theory. But the proposed counterexamples do not satisfy the required assumptions.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
05/17/2018

The Blessings of Multiple Causes

Causal inference from observation data often assumes "strong ignorabilit...
research
01/10/2021

Entropic Causal Inference: Identifiability and Finite Sample Results

Entropic causal inference is a framework for inferring the causal direct...
research
10/15/2020

Comment: Individualized Treatment Rules Under Endogeneity

This note discusses two recent studies on identification of individualiz...
research
06/02/2022

Revisiting the General Identifiability Problem

We revisit the problem of general identifiability originally introduced ...
research
10/19/2012

Strong Faithfulness and Uniform Consistency in Causal Inference

A fundamental question in causal inference is whether it is possible to ...
research
05/19/2016

Stereotyping and Bias in the Flickr30K Dataset

An untested assumption behind the crowdsourced descriptions of the image...
research
06/17/2022

On the probability of invalidating a causal inference due to limited external validity

External validity is often questionable in empirical research, especiall...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset