Towards Assessing Necessary Competence

04/27/2014

∙

We sketch a series of studies and experiments designed to provide empirical evidence about the truth or falsity of claims that non-prescriptive approaches to standards demand greater competence from regulators than prescriptive approaches require.

READ FULL TEXT

Towards Assessing Necessary Competence

COVID-Fact: Fact Extraction and Verification of Real-World Claims on COVID-19 Pandemic

HealthFC: A Dataset of Health Claims for Evidence-Based Medical Fact-Checking

Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claims

Reference-Based Sketch Image Colorization using Augmented-Self Reference and Dense Semantic Correspondence

Assessing Trustworthiness of Autonomous Systems

To Revise or Not to Revise: Learning to Detect Improvable Claims for Argumentative Writing Support

A Review of Methods for Estimating Algorithmic Complexity: Options, Challenges, and New Directions

Towards Assessing Necessary Competence

Related Research

COVID-Fact: Fact Extraction and Verification of Real-World Claims on COVID-19 Pandemic

HealthFC: A Dataset of Health Claims for Evidence-Based Medical Fact-Checking

Explainable Automated Fact-Checking for Public Health Claims

Reference-Based Sketch Image Colorization using Augmented-Self Reference and Dense Semantic Correspondence

Assessing Trustworthiness of Autonomous Systems

To Revise or Not to Revise: Learning to Detect Improvable Claims for Argumentative Writing Support

A Review of Methods for Estimating Algorithmic Complexity: Options, Challenges, and New Directions