Towards a Framework for the Design, Implementation and Reporting of Methodology Scoping Reviews

by   Glen P. Martin, et al.

Background: In view of the growth of published papers, there is an increasing need for studies that summarise scientific research. An increasingly common review is a 'Methodology scoping review', which provides a summary of existing analytical methods, techniques and software, proposed or applied in research articles, which address an analytical problem or further an analytical approach. However, guidelines for their design, implementation and reporting are limited. Methods: Drawing on the experiences of the authors, which were consolidated through a series of face-to-face workshops, we summarise the challenges inherent in conducting a methodology scoping review and offer suggestions of best practice to promote future guideline development. Results: We identified three challenges of conducting a methodology scoping review. First, identification of search terms; one cannot usually define the search terms a priori and the language used for a particular method can vary across the literature. Second, the scope of the review requires careful consideration since new methodology is often not described (in full) within abstracts. Third, many new methods are motivated by a specific clinical question, where the methodology may only be documented in supplementary materials. We formulated several recommendations that build upon existing review guidelines. These recommendations ranged from an iterative approach to defining search terms through to screening and data extraction processes. Conclusion: Although methodology scoping reviews are an important aspect of research, there is currently a lack of guidelines to standardise their design, implementation and reporting. We recommend a wider discussion on this topic.



There are no comments yet.



Guidelines for conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering

Context: A Multivocal Literature Review (MLR) is a form of a Systematic ...

A review of heath economic evaluation practice in the Netherlands: are we moving forward?

In 2016, the Dutch National Health Care Institute issued new guidelines ...

Guidelines for including the grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering

Context: A Multivocal Literature Review (MLR) is a form of a Systematic ...

Retrieving and mining professional experience of software practice from grey literature: an exploratory review

Background: Retrieving and mining practitioners' self–reports of their p...

What and How Are We Reporting in HRI? A Review and Recommendations for Reporting Recruitment, Compensation, and Gender

Study reproducibility and generalizability of results to broadly inclusi...

A Comprehensive Scoping Review of Bayesian Networks in Healthcare: Past, Present and Future

No comprehensive review of Bayesian networks (BNs) in healthcare has bee...

HEVC Watermarking Techniques for Authentication and Copyright Applications: Challenges and Opportunities

Recently, High-Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC/H.265) has been chosen to r...
This week in AI

Get the week's most popular data science and artificial intelligence research sent straight to your inbox every Saturday.