To ArXiv or not to ArXiv: A Study Quantifying Pros and Cons of Posting Preprints Online

03/31/2022
by   Charvi Rastogi, et al.
0

Double-blind conferences have engaged in debates over whether to allow authors to post their papers online on arXiv or elsewhere during the review process. Independently, some authors of research papers face the dilemma of whether to put their papers on arXiv due to its pros and cons. We conduct a study to substantiate this debate and dilemma via quantitative measurements. Specifically, we conducted surveys of reviewers in two top-tier double-blind computer science conferences – ICML 2021 (5361 submissions and 4699 reviewers) and EC 2021 (498 submissions and 190 reviewers). Our two main findings are as follows. First, more than a third of the reviewers self-report searching online for a paper they are assigned to review. Second, outside the review process, we find that preprints from better-ranked affiliations see a weakly higher visibility, with a correlation of 0.06 in ICML and 0.05 in EC. In particular, papers associated with the top-10-ranked affiliations had a visibility of approximately 11 visibility of 7

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
07/01/2020

De-anonymization of authors through arXiv submissions during double-blind review

In this paper, we investigate the effects of releasing arXiv preprints o...
research
02/06/2018

Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics

Double-blind peer review has been proposed as a possible solution to avo...
research
06/30/2021

An Analysis of the Recent Visibility of the SigDial Conference

Automated speech and text interfaces are continuing to improve, resultin...
research
09/05/2017

Effectiveness of Anonymization in Double-Blind Review

Double-blind review relies on the authors' ability and willingness to ef...
research
02/01/2017

Single versus Double Blind Reviewing at WSDM 2017

In this paper we study the implications for conference program committee...
research
06/05/2023

Has the Machine Learning Review Process Become More Arbitrary as the Field Has Grown? The NeurIPS 2021 Consistency Experiment

We present the NeurIPS 2021 consistency experiment, a larger-scale varia...
research
11/14/2022

Cracking Double-Blind Review: Authorship Attribution with Deep Learning

Double-blind peer review is considered a pillar of academic research bec...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset