The Utility of Hedged Assertions in the Emergence of Shared Categorical Labels

01/25/2016
by   Martha Lewis, et al.
0

We investigate the emergence of shared concepts in a community of language users using a multi-agent simulation. We extend results showing that negated assertions are of use in developing shared categories, to include assertions modified by linguistic hedges. Results show that using hedged assertions positively affects the emergence of shared categories in two distinct ways. Firstly, using contraction hedges like `very' gives better convergence over time. Secondly, using expansion hedges such as `quite' reduces concept overlap. However, both these improvements come at a cost of slower speed of development.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
05/31/2019

Symbol Emergence as an Interpersonal Multimodal Categorization

This study focuses on category formation for individual agents and the d...
research
12/03/2019

BADGER: Learning to (Learn [Learning Algorithms] through Multi-Agent Communication)

In this work, we propose a novel memory-based multi-agent meta-learning ...
research
01/23/2020

Compositional properties of emergent languages in deep learning

Recent findings in multi-agent deep learning systems point towards the e...
research
12/17/2020

ReferentialGym: A Nomenclature and Framework for Language Emergence Grounding in (Visual) Referential Games

Natural languages are powerful tools wielded by human beings to communic...
research
03/04/2020

On Emergent Communication in Competitive Multi-Agent Teams

Several recent works have found the emergence of grounded compositional ...
research
06/03/2020

Emergent Multi-Agent Communication in the Deep Learning Era

The ability to cooperate through language is a defining feature of human...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset