The power of the largest player

03/13/2018
by   Sascha Kurz, et al.
0

Decisions in a shareholder meeting or a legislative committee are often modeled as a weighted game. Influence of a member is then measured by a power index. A large variety of different indices has been introduced in the literature. This paper analyzes how power indices differ with respect to the largest possible power of a non-dictatorial player. It turns out that the considered set of power indices can be partitioned into two classes. This may serve as another indication which index to use in a given application.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
10/17/2020

On Banzhaf and Shapley-Shubik Fixed Points and Divisor Voting Systems

The Banzhaf and Shapley-Shubik power indices were first introduced to me...
research
12/14/2018

Which criteria qualify power indices for applications? -- A comment to "The story of the poor Public Good index"

We discuss possible criteria that may qualify or disqualify power indice...
research
11/14/2017

Feature importance scores and lossless feature pruning using Banzhaf power indices

Understanding the influence of features in machine learning is crucial t...
research
03/04/2019

Attacking Power Indices by Manipulating Player Reliability

We investigate the manipulation of power indices in TU-cooperative games...
research
10/15/2020

Learning Languages with Decidable Hypotheses

In language learning in the limit, the most common type of hypothesis is...
research
06/25/2020

Estimating Asset Class Health Indices in Power Systems

Power systems have widely adopted the concept of health index to describ...
research
07/19/2020

Reconstructing weighted voting schemes from partial information about their power indices

A number of recent works [Goldberg 2006; O'Donnell and Servedio 2011; De...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset