DeepAI AI Chat
Log In Sign Up

The Managerial Effects of Algorithmic Fairness Activism

by   Bo Cowgill, et al.

How do ethical arguments affect AI adoption in business? We randomly expose business decision-makers to arguments used in AI fairness activism. Arguments emphasizing the inescapability of algorithmic bias lead managers to abandon AI for manual review by humans and report greater expectations about lawsuits and negative PR. These effects persist even when AI lowers gender and racial disparities and when engineering investments to address AI fairness are feasible. Emphasis on status quo comparisons yields opposite effects. We also measure the effects of "scientific veneer" in AI ethics arguments. Scientific veneer changes managerial behavior but does not asymmetrically benefit favorable (versus critical) AI activism.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4


Closing the AI Knowledge Gap

AI researchers employ not only the scientific method, but also methodolo...

On Explanations, Fairness, and Appropriate Reliance in Human-AI Decision-Making

Explanations have been framed as an essential feature for better and fai...

Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairness

Intersectionality is a critical framework that, through inquiry and prax...

The Long Arc of Fairness: Formalisations and Ethical Discourse

In recent years, the idea of formalising and modelling fairness for algo...

A Seven-Layer Model for Standardising AI Fairness Assessment

Problem statement: Standardisation of AI fairness rules and benchmarks i...

Algorithmic Fairness in Business Analytics: Directions for Research and Practice

The extensive adoption of business analytics (BA) has brought financial ...

A Popperian Falsification of AI - Lighthill's Argument Defended

The area of computation called artificial intelligence (AI) is falsified...