DeepAI AI Chat
Log In Sign Up

The Limits of Morality in Strategic Games

01/22/2019
by   Rui Cao, et al.
The University of British Columbia
cornell university
0

A coalition is blameable for an outcome if the coalition had a strategy to prevent it. It has been previously suggested that the cost of prevention, or the cost of sacrifice, can be used to measure the degree of blameworthiness. The paper adopts this approach and proposes a modal logical system for reasoning about the degree of blameworthiness. The main technical result is a completeness theorem for the proposed system.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

10/10/2019

Strategic Coalitions in Stochastic Games

The article introduces a notion of a stochastic game with failure states...
09/14/2018

Blameworthiness in Strategic Games

There are multiple notions of coalitional responsibility. The focus of t...
11/08/2019

Duty to Warn in Strategic Games

The paper investigates the second-order blameworthiness or duty to warn ...
11/05/2018

Blameworthiness in Games with Imperfect Information

Blameworthiness of an agent or a coalition of agents is often defined in...
11/05/2018

Knowledge and Blameworthiness

Blameworthiness of an agent or a coalition of agents is often defined in...
07/13/2017

Strategic Coalitions with Perfect Recall

The paper proposes a bimodal logic that describes an interplay between d...
05/10/2021

Budget-Constrained Coalition Strategies with Discounting

Discounting future costs and rewards is a common practice in accounting,...