The Limits of Morality in Strategic Games

01/22/2019
by   Rui Cao, et al.
0

A coalition is blameable for an outcome if the coalition had a strategy to prevent it. It has been previously suggested that the cost of prevention, or the cost of sacrifice, can be used to measure the degree of blameworthiness. The paper adopts this approach and proposes a modal logical system for reasoning about the degree of blameworthiness. The main technical result is a completeness theorem for the proposed system.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
10/10/2019

Strategic Coalitions in Stochastic Games

The article introduces a notion of a stochastic game with failure states...
research
09/14/2018

Blameworthiness in Strategic Games

There are multiple notions of coalitional responsibility. The focus of t...
research
11/08/2019

Duty to Warn in Strategic Games

The paper investigates the second-order blameworthiness or duty to warn ...
research
11/05/2018

Blameworthiness in Games with Imperfect Information

Blameworthiness of an agent or a coalition of agents is often defined in...
research
11/05/2018

Knowledge and Blameworthiness

Blameworthiness of an agent or a coalition of agents is often defined in...
research
07/13/2017

Strategic Coalitions with Perfect Recall

The paper proposes a bimodal logic that describes an interplay between d...
research
05/10/2021

Budget-Constrained Coalition Strategies with Discounting

Discounting future costs and rewards is a common practice in accounting,...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset