The Impact of Unmeasured Within- and Between-Cluster Confounding on the Bias of Effect Estimators from Fixed Effect, Mixed effect and Instrumental Variable Models

05/19/2020
by   Yun Li, et al.
0

Instrumental variable methods are popular choices in combating unmeasured confounding to obtain less biased effect estimates. However, we demonstrate that alternative methods may give less biased estimates depending on the nature of unmeasured confounding. Treatment preferences of clusters (e.g., physician practices) are the most f6requently used instruments in instrumental variable analyses (IVA). These preference-based IVAs are usually conducted on data clustered by region, hospital/facility, or physician, where unmeasured confounding often occurs within or between clusters. We aim to quantify the impact of unmeasured confounding on the bias of effect estimators in IVA, as well as alternative methods including ordinary least squares regression, linear mixed models (LMM) and fixed effect models (FE) to study the effect of a continuous exposure (e.g., treatment dose). We derive bias formulae of estimators from these four methods in the presence of unmeasured within- and/or between-cluster confounders. We show that IVAs can provide consistent estimates when unmeasured within-cluster confounding exists, but not when between-cluster confounding exists. On the other hand, FEs and LMMs can provide consistent estimates when unmeasured between-cluster confounding exits, but not for within-cluster confounding. Whether IVAs are advantageous in reducing bias over FEs and LMMs depends on the extent of unmeasured within-cluster confounding relative to between-cluster confounding. Furthermore, the impact of unmeasured between-cluster confounding on IVA estimates is larger than the impact of unmeasured within-cluster confounding on FE and LMM estimates. We illustrate these methods through data applications. Our findings provide guidance for choosing appropriate methods to combat the dominant types of unmeasured confounders and help interpret statistical results in the context of unmeasured confounding

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
08/23/2023

Consistency of common spatial estimators under spatial confounding

This paper addresses the asymptotic performance of popular spatial regre...
research
05/10/2023

Robust Privacy-Preserving Models for Cluster-Level Confounding: Recognizing Disparities in Access to Transplantation

In applications where the study data are collected within cluster units ...
research
08/05/2018

Inverse Conditional Probability Weighting with Clustered Data in Causal Inference

Estimating the average treatment causal effect in clustered data often i...
research
01/13/2023

Re-thinking Spatial Confounding in Spatial Linear Mixed Models

In the last two decades, considerable research has been devoted to a phe...
research
07/16/2021

Accounting for spatial confounding in epidemiological studies with individual-level exposures: An exposure-penalized spline approach

In the presence of unmeasured spatial confounding, spatial models may ac...
research
09/22/2019

IFAA: Robust association identification and Inference For Absolute Abundance in microbiome analyses

The target of inference in microbiome analyses is usually relative abund...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset