The false myth of the rise in self-citations, and the impressively positive effect of bibliometric evaluations on the increase of the impact of Italian research

10/06/2019
by   Pietro D'Antuono, et al.
0

It has recently been claimed by Baccini and coauthors that due to ANVUR's bibliometric evaluations of individuals, departments, and universities, in Italy there has been a surge in self-citations in the last ten years, thus increasing the "inwardness" of Italian research more than has happened abroad. We have studied the database of Ioannidis et al. published on 12 August 2019 of the one hundred thousand most "highly cited" scientists, including about two thousand Italians, and we found that the problem of self-citations in relation to this scientific elite is not significant in Italy, while perhaps observing a small deviation in the low scores in the rankings. The effect indicated by Baccini et al. consequently, does not seem worrying for the scientific elite (we quantified it in 2 percent of the total of scientists of the "best" one hundred thousand), and is probably largely concentrated in the further less cited scientists. Evaluation agencies like ANVUR should probably exclude self-citations in future evaluations, for the noise introduced by the young researchers. The overall state of health of the Italian research system and the positive effect of the ANVUR assessments are demonstrated by the number of Italian researchers in the top one hundred thousand, which has increased by comparing the "career" databased of 22 years, with that of the "young" researchers in the "2017" database. Italy, looking at the elite researchers, not only is not the most indulgent in self-citations, but has shown the best improvements, proving that the introduction of ANVUR had a positive effect. Indeed, all countries apart from Italy have suffered a decline, even substantial (-20 percent on a national Japan scale), of the number of researchers present in the 2017 data sets compared to career data. Italy instead shows a +0.2 percent on a global basis and an impressive +11.53 percent on a national basis.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
03/05/2023

Are self-citations a normal feature of knowledge accumulation?

Science is a cumulative activity, which can manifest itself through the ...
research
04/09/2019

Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: a country-level comparative analysis

It is several years since national research evaluation systems around th...
research
10/27/2004

A note on comparison of scientific impact expressed by the number of citations in different fields of science

Citation distributions for 1992, 1994, 1996, 1997, 1999, and 2001, which...
research
12/21/2020

A qualitative and quantitative analysis of open citations to retracted articles: the Wakefield et al.'s case

In this article, we show the results of a quantitative and qualitative a...
research
03/14/2023

A global exploratory comparison of country self-citations 1996-2019

Self-citations are a key topic in evaluative bibliometrics because they ...
research
02/17/2021

Is preprint the future of science? A thirty year journey of online preprint services

Preprint is a version of a scientific paper that is publicly distributed...
research
09/03/2021

Validated research assessment based on highly cited researchers

Bibliometrics provides accurate, cheap and simple descriptions of resear...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset