The #ETH is False, #k-SAT is in Sub-Exponential Time

02/03/2021
by   Giorgio Camerani, et al.
0

We orchestrate a randomized algorithm for #k-SAT which counts the exact number of satisfying assignments in 2^o(n) time. The existence of such algorithm signifies that the #ETH is hereby refuted, and so are ⊕ETH, ETH, #SETH, ⊕SETH and SETH.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
11/03/2020

The Long, the Short and the Random

We furnish solid evidence, both theoretical and empirical, towards the e...
research
01/17/2020

Simpler Partial Derandomization of PPSZ for k-SAT

We give a simpler derandomization of the best known k-SAT algorithm PPSZ...
research
09/16/2018

A #SAT Algorithm for Small Constant-Depth Circuits with PTF gates

We show that there is a randomized algorithm that, when given a small co...
research
11/04/2020

A Multistage View on 2-Satisfiability

We study q-SAT in the multistage model, focusing on the linear-time solv...
research
03/27/2023

On CNF Conversion for SAT Enumeration

Modern SAT solvers are designed to handle problems expressed in Conjunct...
research
07/06/2021

MAJORITY-3SAT (and Related Problems) in Polynomial Time

Majority-SAT is the problem of determining whether an input n-variable f...
research
07/25/2019

Introducing Autarkies for DQCNF

Autarkies for SAT can be used for theoretical studies, pre-processing an...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset