The eDiscovery Medicine Show

09/28/2021
by   Maura R. Grossman, et al.
0

The practice of bloodletting gradually fell into disfavor as a growing body of scientific evidence showed its ineffectiveness and demonstrated the effectiveness of various pharmaceuticals for the prevention and treatment of certain diseases. At the same time, the patent medicine industry promoted ineffective remedies at medicine shows featuring entertainment, testimonials, and pseudo-scientific claims with all the trappings–but none of the methodology–of science. Today, many producing parties and eDiscovery vendors similarly promote obsolete technology as well as unvetted tools labeled "artificial intelligence" or "technology-assisted review," along with unsound validation protocols. This situation will end only when eDiscovery technologies and tools are subject to testing using the methods of information retrieval.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/30/2022

Artificial Intelligence and Medicine: A literature review

In practically every industry today, artificial intelligence is one of t...
research
12/01/2020

Neural language models for text classification in evidence-based medicine

The COVID-19 has brought about a significant challenge to the whole of h...
research
04/16/2021

An Analysis of a BERT Deep Learning Strategy on a Technology Assisted Review Task

Document screening is a central task within Evidenced Based Medicine, wh...
research
02/16/2018

Artificial intelligence and pediatrics: A synthetic mini review

The use of artificial intelligence intelligencein medicine can be traced...
research
04/20/2021

An Analysis of Indexing and Querying Strategies on a Technologically Assisted Review Task

This paper presents a preliminary experimentation study using the CLEF 2...
research
04/04/2022

On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence

Imagine an oracle that correctly predicts the outcome of every particle ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset