Temporality and Causality in Abstract Argumentation

03/16/2023
by   Y. Munro, et al.
0

In the context of abstract argumentation, we present the benefits of considering temporality, i.e. the order in which arguments are enunciated, as well as causality. We propose a formal method to rewrite the concepts of acyclic abstract argumentation frameworks into an action language, that allows us to model the evolution of the world, and to establish causal relationships between the enunciation of arguments and their consequences, whether direct or indirect. An Answer Set Programming implementation is also proposed, as well as perspectives towards explanations.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
11/03/2020

On Computing Stable Extensions of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks

An abstract argumentation framework (af for short) is a directed graph (...
research
08/04/2013

Stratified Labelings for Abstract Argumentation

We introduce stratified labelings as a novel semantical approach to abst...
research
01/16/2014

Arguments using ontological and causal knowledge

We investigate an approach to reasoning about causes through argumentati...
research
11/30/2018

A Tutorial for Weighted Bipolar Argumentation with Continuous Dynamical Systems and the Java Library Attractor

Weighted bipolar argumentation frameworks allow modeling decision proble...
research
11/04/2021

Logically Sound Arguments for the Effectiveness of ML Safety Measures

We investigate the issues of achieving sufficient rigor in the arguments...
research
05/09/2017

A note on the uniqueness of models in social abstract argumentation

Social abstract argumentation is a principled way to assign values to co...
research
10/11/2018

Automata for Infinite Argumentation Structures

The theory of abstract argumentation frameworks (afs) has, in the main, ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset