Strong & Weak Methods: A Logical View of Uncertainty

03/27/2013
by   John Fox, et al.
0

The last few years has seen a growing debate about techniques for managing uncertainty in AI systems. Unfortunately this debate has been cast as a rivalry between AI methods and classical probability based ones. Three arguments for extending the probability framework of uncertainty are presented, none of which imply a challenge to classical methods. These are (1) explicit representation of several types of uncertainty, specifically possibility and plausibility, as well as probability, (2) the use of weak methods for uncertainty management in problems which are poorly defined, and (3) symbolic representation of different uncertainty calculi and methods for choosing between them.

READ FULL TEXT
research
03/27/2013

Decision under Uncertainty

We derive axiomatically the probability function that should be used to ...
research
04/14/2021

Uncertainty measures: The big picture

Probability theory is far from being the most general mathematical theor...
research
01/23/2013

Choosing Among Interpretations of Probability

There is available an ever-increasing variety of procedures for managing...
research
09/05/2013

Weighted regret-based likelihood: a new approach to describing uncertainty

Recently, Halpern and Leung suggested representing uncertainty by a weig...
research
11/28/2018

Towards Identifying and Managing Sources of Uncertainty in AI and Machine Learning Models - An Overview

Quantifying and managing uncertainties that occur when data-driven model...
research
03/06/2013

Dialectic Reasoning with Inconsistent Information

From an inconsistent database non-trivial arguments may be constructed b...
research
08/29/2017

Plausibility and probability in deductive reasoning

We consider the problem of rational uncertainty about unproven mathemati...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset