Strong Admissibility for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) have been introduced as a formalism for modeling and evaluating argumentation allowing general logical satisfaction conditions. Different criteria used to settle the acceptance of arguments are called semantics. Semantics of ADFs have so far mainly been defined based on the concept of admissibility. However, the notion of strongly admissible semantics studied for abstract argumentation frameworks has not yet been introduced for ADFs. In the current work we present the concept of strong admissibility of interpretations for ADFs. Further, we show that strongly admissible interpretations of ADFs form a lattice with the grounded interpretation as top element.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
07/16/2014

A Plausibility Semantics for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks

We propose and investigate a simple ranking-measure-based extension sema...
research
05/21/2023

Non-flat ABA is an Instance of Bipolar Argumentation

Assumption-based Argumentation (ABA) is a well-known structured argument...
research
07/07/2020

Expressiveness of SETAFs and Support-Free ADFs under 3-valued Semantics

Generalizing the attack structure in argumentation frameworks (AFs) has ...
research
11/04/2019

Compiling Arguments in an Argumentation Framework into Three-valued Logical Expressions

In this paper, we propose a new method for computing general allocators ...
research
05/02/2014

Extension-based Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks

One of the most prominent tools for abstract argumentation is the Dung's...
research
06/20/2018

Weighted Abstract Dialectical Frameworks: Extended and Revised Report

Abstract Dialectical Frameworks (ADFs) generalize Dung's argumentation f...
research
03/31/2016

Characterizing Realizability in Abstract Argumentation

Realizability for knowledge representation formalisms studies the follow...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset