Stratified Labelings for Abstract Argumentation

08/04/2013
by   Matthias Thimm, et al.
0

We introduce stratified labelings as a novel semantical approach to abstract argumentation frameworks. Compared to standard labelings, stratified labelings provide a more fine-grained assessment of the controversiality of arguments using ranks instead of the usual labels in, out, and undecided. We relate the framework of stratified labelings to conditional logic and, in particular, to the System Z ranking functions.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
08/05/2020

Towards Ranking-based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation using Conditional Logic Semantics

We propose a novel ranking-based semantics for Dung-style argumentation ...
research
10/18/2021

A Formalisation of Abstract Argumentation in Higher-Order Logic

We present an approach for representing abstract argumentation framework...
research
03/16/2023

Temporality and Causality in Abstract Argumentation

In the context of abstract argumentation, we present the benefits of con...
research
07/22/2019

Aggregation in Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks

Value-based argumentation enhances a classical abstract argumentation gr...
research
05/09/2017

A note on the uniqueness of models in social abstract argumentation

Social abstract argumentation is a principled way to assign values to co...
research
04/27/2015

Theory of Semi-Instantiation in Abstract Argumentation

We study instantiated abstract argumentation frames of the form (S,R,I),...
research
04/21/2022

Revisiting initial sets in abstract argumentation

We revisit the notion of initial sets by Xu and Cayrol, i.e., non-empty ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset