Some Common Mistakes in the Teaching and Textbooks of Modal Logic
share
We discuss four common mistakes in the teaching and textbooks of modal logic. The first one is missing the axiom φ↔φ, when choosing as the primitive modal operator, misunderstanding that and are symmetric. The second one is forgetting to make the set of formulas for filtration closed under subformulas, when proving the finite model property through filtration, neglecting that φ and φ may be abbreviations of formulas. The third one is giving wrong definitions of canonical relations in minimal canonical models that are unmatched with the primitive modal operators. The final one is misunderstanding the rule of necessitation, without knowing its distinction from the rule of modus ponens. To better understand the rule of necessitation, we summarize six ways of defining deductive consequence in modal logic: omitted definition, classical definition, ternary definition, reduced definition, bounded definition, and deflationary definition, and show that the last three definitions are equivalent to each other.
READ FULL TEXT