Soft Robotic Finger with Variable Effective Length enabled by an Antagonistic Constraint Mechanism

12/28/2021
by   Xing Wang, et al.
0

Compared to traditional rigid robotics, soft robotics has attracted increasing attention due to its advantages as compliance, safety, and low cost. As an essential part of soft robotics, the soft robotic gripper also shows its superior while grasping the objects with irregular shapes. Recent research has been conducted to improve its grasping performance by adjusting the variable effective length (VEL). However, the VEL achieved by multi-chamber design or tunable stiffness shape memory material requires complex pneumatic circuit design or a time-consuming phase-changing process. This work proposes a fold-based soft robotic actuator made from 3D printed filament, NinjaFlex. It is experimentally tested and represented by the hyperelastic model. Mathematic and finite element modelling is conducted to study the bending behaviour of the proposed soft actuator. Besides, an antagonistic constraint mechanism is proposed to achieve the VEL, and the experiments demonstrate that better conformity is achieved. Finally, a two-mode gripper is designed and evaluated to demonstrate the advances of VEL on grasping performance.

READ FULL TEXT VIEW PDF
POST COMMENT

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Authors

page 2

page 4

page 5

page 6

09/02/2020

A Novel Design of Soft Robotic Hand with a Human-inspired Soft Palm for Dexterous Grasping

Soft robotic hands and grippers are increasingly attracting attention as...
11/02/2021

Towards Very Low-Cost Iterative Prototyping for Fully Printable Dexterous Soft Robotic Hands

The design and fabrication of soft robot hands is still a time-consuming...
12/03/2019

Fire Resistance Deformable Soft Gripper Based on Wire Jamming Mechanism

Able to grasp objects of any shape and size, universal grippers using va...
09/10/2021

Jammkle: Fibre jamming 3D printed multi-material tendons and their application in a robotic ankle

Fibre jamming is a relatively new and understudied soft robotic mechanis...
11/07/2021

GSG: A Granary Soft Gripper with Mechanical Force Sensing via 3-Dimensional Snap-Through Structure

Grasping is an essential capability for most robots in practical applica...
02/13/2019

A bistable soft gripper with mechanically embedded sensing and actuation for fast closed-loop grasping

Soft robotic grippers are shown to be high effective for grasping unstru...
07/12/2021

SoRoSim: a MATLAB Toolbox for Soft Robotics Based on the Geometric Variable-strain Approach

Soft robotics has been a trending topic within the robotics community fo...
This week in AI

Get the week's most popular data science and artificial intelligence research sent straight to your inbox every Saturday.

I Introduction

Soft robotics has been extensively studied recently due to its inherent advantages of being compliant, robust to impact, flexible, and safe compared to the traditional rigid robotics [12]

. One of its key types is the soft robotic bending actuator, which can be classified into three main categories based on its bending principle: fiber-reinforced soft actuator

[17], PneuNet [1], and eccentric actuator [18], corresponding to multi-material asymmetry, pleated structure asymmetry, and eccentric void asymmetry principle respectively. The soft bending finger demonstrates the excellent applicability in the design and manufacture of the soft robotic gripper [5, 20], soft prosthetic device [3], rehabilitation device [2], and various types of locomotion robots [10]. Among these, the soft robotic gripper shows advantages in grasping objects with different shapes and weights.

There has been pioneering research conducted on the development of dexterous soft robotic grippers, which aims to improve the performance of the gripper in terms of the allowable grasping size, grasping force, etc. Park et al. [7] proposed a hybrid PneuNet gripper for the improved force and speed grasping application. Zhou et al. [22] designed a three-segment soft gripper to grasp objects with more sizes. Afterward, he proposed another 13-DOF soft hand for dexterous grasping [23]. However, the multi-segment/DOF design typically requires multi-active channels, tubing, and multi-valve pneumatic systems to control individual segment for a desired effective length, making the pneumatic control system significantly complex and bulky. Besides, the variable effective length (VEL) is also explored for the soft finger with one whole segment to achieve better conformity of the objects, allowing better grasping in various shapes and weights. Hao et al. [4] proposed a gripper that can achieve VEL by selectively softening shape memory polymer (SMP) sections via a flexible heater. Even the softening can be realized within 0.6 seconds; the cooling of SMP takes up to 14 seconds. The exact timing issue limits the broader application of an SMP-enabled VEL soft actuator designed in Ref [14, 9].

This study introduces a folded-based soft bending actuator with a VEL function enabled by an antagonistic constraint mechanism (ACM). The VEL enabled by the selectively placed tendon constraint on the soft actuator allows a design without a time-consuming reprint process. The stress-strain curve of NinjaFlex is experimentally determined due to its nonlinear property as a hyperelastic material. Experiments are also conducted on bending motion of soft finger with VEL enabled by tendon constraint. The main contributions of this research work are as follows:

  • Mathematically modeling with the hyperelastic property of NinjaFlex is derived for the fold-based soft actuator to study the bending angle under various input pressures.

  • Variable effective length is achieved with fold-based design by an antagonistic constraint mechanism.

  • A two-mode gripper is designed and tested to be capable of grasping and holding objects with various weights and shapes.

Ii Design and Manufacture

The soft actuator was designed in Solidworks (Dassault Systems Solidworks Corp.), as shown in Figures 1. The CAD model was then sliced in PrusaSlicer. The key printing settings that affect the airtight of the soft finger were sourced from our previous work [15, 16], then tuned and tested to fit this manufacture. After testing, a low-cost FDM 3D printer, Prusa Mk3s, was utilized to print the proposed soft finger with a commercially available filament, NinjaFlex.

Fig. 1: The explored view and assembly of the proposed soft actuator

The soft finger was integrated with the 3D printed rigid mounts, as shown in Figure 1. They are three holes within the 3D printed mount, where the bourdon tubes were slid in for tendon to sit. These bourdon tubes also reduce the potential friction between the rigid mount and the tendon during the actuation process. A commercially available stiff tendon (26.4kg/diameter:0.342mm) was slid into the tendon guide to provide constraints. One end was fixed on the soft finger, and the other end was connected to the actuation mechanism. The cross section view of the design with detailed parameters is shown in Figure 2.

Fig. 2: Cross section view of the design

Iii Mathematical Modeling

Iii-a TPU Characterization and Material Model

To find the stress-strain relationship of the hyperelastic material, NinjaFlex, an uniaxial tensile test was performed on the dumbbell samples. It needs to be noticed that the bending motion of the proposed fold-based design is caused by the expansion of the walls that are printed longitudinally. So the materials are mainly experiencing tension in the longitudinal direction. The dumbbell samples are then printed in the longitudinal direction, as shown in Figure 3.

Fig. 3: (a) Dumbbell sample printed in the longitudinal direction for tensile test, (b) Instron universal machine for tensile test.

The tests were performed under ISO 37 standards, where the samples were stretched by 600% at 200 mm/min by using an Instron Universal Tester E3000 (Instron, USA). The average stress-strain data shown in Figure 4 were fitting to hyperelastic model named Mooney-Rivlin models in Abaqus (Simulia, Dassault Systems, RI) [19], while POLY_N2 in the figure means the Mooney Rivlin model. The parameters used to plot curve are shown in Table I.

Fig. 4: The stress-strain curve and Mooney-Rivlin model of NinjaFlex
Hyperelastic Model Material Constant Value
Mooney Rivlin C01 2.898 MPa
C10 -0.0450 MPa
C11 -0.017 MPa
C20 0.00226 MPa
C02 0.183 MPa
incompressible Parameter D 0 MPa
TABLE I: Mooney Rivlin model for NinjaFlex

Iii-B Finite Element Modeling

With the material property defined, it is feasible to perform finite element modeling to study the bending motion of the soft robotic finger [21]. Firstly, the CAD model is saved as a step format and imported into simulation software Abaqus. Next, the material property needs to be defined with the parameters from the previous TPU modeling. The section can be added to the model after creating and assigning the material property. Two surfaces are created named inner and the contact surface, while the former one is selected inside the cavity, and the latter one is to enable self-contact interaction during bending motion. Solid tetrahedral quadratic hybrid elements (element type C3D10H) are used to mesh the soft finger. Various static pressures are input and applied on the inner surface as the load , and ENCASTRE boundary condition is applied at the proximal end.

Iii-C Bending Angle

The bend angle that defines how much the actuator curls is treated as one key index to evaluate its performance [1]. For the fold-based soft actuator, it can be concluded from the preliminary simulation that the bending motion occurs due to the elongation of the top wall of the connector. To calculate the wall expansion, each wall is modeled as a rectangular plate with four edge clamped [8, 13]. The maximum deflection occurs in the center of the plate, while its value is determined by the aspect ratio [11]. To model the expansion of both vertical and top wall, we adopt the equivalent connector conversion from Ref [6], while keeping the rest of the finger dimensions the same. The equivalent connector with the updated dimensions are as shown in Figure 5.

Fig. 5: The cross section view of the soft actuator with (a)the dimensions for the equivalent connector, (b) side view of equivalent connector, (c) energy storage, (d) bending of one segment

The dimensions for the equivalent connector , , and can be expressed with the actual dimension of the connector , , and [6].

(1)
(2)
(3)

All the energy is assumed to store at a distance of from the bottom layer:

(4)
(5)

The total potential energy can be expressed as sum of the work done by air and the strain energy stored in the walls:

(6)
(7)

The constant moment

caused by the constant pressure is assumed to act on the soft finger with a distance of :

(8)
(9)

Upon inflation, each equivalent connector forms a curved shape with radius of and angle of :

(10)

By combining Eqns (7)-(10), we have the work done by the input pressure as follows:

(11)

The strain energy stored in the walls can be expressed as:

(12)
(13)

We assume that the NinjaFlex is incompressible, so equals to 1 and the second component is zero. By combing Eqns (12),(13), the strain energy stored in the walls can be expressed as:

While , are the first and second deviatoric strain invariant, and they can be calculated with equations:

(14)
(15)

It needs to be noticed that in this modeling the material is incompressible, =1, = , =, =1. When the soft finger bends to a certain angle, it is in equilibrium state, so the gradient of the potential energy W.R.T equals to zero, which can be written as:

(16)
(17)
(18)

By combining Eqns (1)-(5),(16)-(18), the bending angle for one connector can be found, then we have:

(19)

From Eqn (19), the bending angle is proportional to the number of the connectors/folds. This means that a variable effective length can be potentially achieved by varying the number the connected segments/folds.

Iv Experiments and Discussion

Iv-a Test of Bending Angle

As a soft bending actuator, it will have various bending states under different inputs. To find out the relationship between the input pressure and the bending angle of this 3D printed fold-based design, the test of bending angle is set up as shown in Figure 6.

Fig. 6: Set up for bending angle test
Fig. 7: Bending angle of the fold-based soft finger (a) 20 kPa experiment, (b) 20 kPa simulation, (c) 50 kPa experiment, (d) 50 kPa simulation, (e) 100 kPa experiment, (f) 100 kPa simulation

The soft finger is fixed at the proximal end and placed horizontally on a grid board. This placement is to eliminate the effect of gravity on the in-plane bending motion. Various pressure inputs are regulated by a pressure regulator (SMC) and then applied into the soft finger with a step of 10 kPa. A camera is fixed on the tripod to capture the image at a certain bending state, which will be further processed to obtain the value of bending angle. The experimental data together with the FEM results under certain pressures can be seen in Figure 7. The mathematical result is obtained from Eqn (19). Besides, a detailed comparison among the experimental results, FEM and the mathematical modeling are also shown in Figure 8.

Fig. 8: Comparison of bending angle data between experiments, modeling, and FEM

It can be seen that the mathematical modeling matches the experimental results well under lower pressures. While the differences are slighter larger under higher pressure values (more than 110 kPa). The geometry parameter is adjusted based on the results to get best fit mathematical model. The maximum error between the prediction and the experiment result is 6.3%. While the FEM demonstrates a higher differences between the experimental results, especially under higher inputs. This might be caused by the relative softer material property defined by the TPU uniaxial test.

Iv-B Variable Effective Length

Fig. 9: Variable effective length of the soft finger with ACM, green line indicates the constrained segments.

This work also proposes an antagonistic constraint mechanism (ACM) to enable a variable effective length. It is designed to constrain the tendon guide side, limiting the bending motion of a certain number of folds/segments. Simulation is also conducted by adding additional constraints to allow various bending patterns, as shown in Figure 9. The ACM is realized by tendon constraint, as highlighted in the green line in Figure 9. The proposed ACM can achieve variable effective length, which can be potentially conform to objects of different contours. To investigate shape conformity, several samples with various curvatures are utilized as the test samples. The effective length of the soft finger is selected based on the curvature of the samples. As shown in Figure 10, the full effective length shows best fit to a constant curvature sample, while the ACM soft finger conforms to the other irregular samples well based on the area of contact. This is due to the advances of ACM, which extends the soft finger from a single bending profile to versatile bending shapes.

Fig. 10: Conformity test of the VEL soft actuator

Iv-C Gripper Design and Grasping Tests

Fig. 11: The detailed design of proposed soft gripper with key components labeled

The ACM mechanism enables the soft robotic finger with VEL property, with which a certain effective length can be tuned for a specific object. To achieve this, we design a soft robotic gripper with two fingers facing each other. The detailed design for the gripper is shown in Figure 11.

Fig. 12: Grasping test of (a) rectangular plate, 22g, (b) wooden block, (202g), (c) knife, 78g, (d) wooden block (207g), (e) water bottle spray (435g)

Both actuators are actuated with positive pneumatic pressure, while the antagonistic constraint mechanism is enabled by tendon-fasten. In detail, one end of the tendon is fixed by a step motor once the shorter effective length of the actuator is required. The gripper is designed to have two modes: the full-bending mode and tip-bending mode. While the tip-bending mode is achieved by preset the fixed point on the third last fold on the soft finger. This fixed point can be adjusted or added quickly for a tunable effective length before the grasping tasks.

We mounted the gripper on a commercially-available industry robotic arm, UR5, to perform grasping tasks. The soft gripper first demonstrates its grasping capacity by gripping objects with various shapes by both pinch and power grasp, as shown in Figure 12. The gripper successfully picked up objects with pinch and power grasps, weighting from 22g to 435g.

To further investigate the effect of VEL on the soft finger, the tendon position is initially locked by the step motor. As a result, only unconstrained segments are free to bend. The comparison between the full bending and the bending with different effective lengths is shown in Figure 13. It can be seen from the grasping patterns that the contact area can be increased significantly when the soft finger switches to different effective lengths for a specific object. The increase in the contact area can benefit the envelope grasping and be potentially utilized to receive more contact information when the sensing mechanism is integrated. The benefit of the VEL on the grasping force is evaluated by a test of pull-out force, as shown in Figure 14.

Fig. 13: Grasping of rectangular plate with (a) full effective length, (b) constrained effective length (tip); Grasping of ball with (c) full effective length, (d) constrained effective length (tip)
Fig. 14: Setup for the test of pull-out force

Cylinders with different dimensions are grasped and held by the soft gripper in two separate modes. The weights are hanging to provide the gravity force to pull the cylinder out of the gripper. The critical pull-out force is utilized as an index to evaluate the grasping force. A detailed comparison between modes when grasping cylinders of different dimensions is shown in Figure 15 (a). From results, the force required to pull the cylinder out becomes larger with the increase of input pressure or the diameter of the cylinder. This is because soft finger can generate more grasping force with the increase of pressure or the contact area. The constrained effect length can generate more force for a smaller cylinder but fails to grasp a larger one due to the limited length.

Fig. 15: Results for pull-out force test (a) Pull-out force with various input pressures for soft finger with full effective length (FEL), (b) comparison between the pull-out force between FEL and constrained effective length (CEL)

V Conclusions

To achieve a wider application of the soft robotic gripper on grasping objects with various shapes and weights, this work proposes a VEL soft robotic finger enabled by ACM. The robotic finger is made from direct 3D printing, which simplifies the manufacturing complexity compared with the multi-step casting method. The NinjaFlex utilized is also experimentally tested to provide more detailed and appropriate material properties for the modeling. Energy-based mathematically modeling is proposed to model the bending angle by considering the hyperelastic property of NinjaFlex. The experimental results indicate that the proposed model can predict the bending behavior within a maximum error of 6.3% under the maximum operation pressure (130 kPa). The VEL is also demonstrated to be superior when grasping non-constant curvature samples based on the area of contact. A two-mode gripper is finally designed to test the grasping performance, which can lift objects with various shapes.

There are still limitations on the proposed ACM; for example, the variable effective length in the middle segments of the soft finger currently requires manual adjustment. Even though it is much more efficient than redesigning and reprinting the soft actuator, the automatically programmed VEL function will still benefit a more intelligent grasping. Future research will be focused on enabling the automatic switching of the constraint point on the soft actuator.

References

  • [1] G. Alici, T. Canty, R. Mutlu, W. Hu, and V. Sencadas (2018) Modeling and experimental evaluation of bending behavior of soft pneumatic actuators made of discrete actuation chambers. Soft robotics 5 (1), pp. 24–35. Cited by: §I, §III-C.
  • [2] Y. Chen, S. Le, Q. C. Tan, O. Lau, F. Wan, and C. Song (2017) A lobster-inspired robotic glove for hand rehabilitation. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4782–4787. Cited by: §I.
  • [3] G. Gu, N. Zhang, H. Xu, S. Lin, Y. Yu, G. Chai, L. Ge, H. Yang, Q. Shao, X. Sheng, et al. (2021) A soft neuroprosthetic hand providing simultaneous myoelectric control and tactile feedback. Nature Biomedical Engineering, pp. 1–10. Cited by: §I.
  • [4] Y. Hao, Z. Liu, J. Liu, X. Fang, B. Fang, S. Nie, Y. Guan, F. Sun, T. Wang, and L. Wen (2020) A soft gripper with programmable effective length, tactile and curvature sensory feedback. Smart Materials and Structures 29 (3), pp. 035006. Cited by: §I.
  • [5] H. Kang, H. Zhou, X. Wang, and C. Chen (2020)

    Real-time fruit recognition and grasping estimation for robotic apple harvesting

    .
    Sensors 20 (19), pp. 5670. Cited by: §I.
  • [6] A. Lotfiani, X. Yi, Z. Shao, H. Zhao, and A. N. Parkestani (2021) Analytical modeling and optimization of a corrugated soft pneumatic finger considering the performance of pinch and power grasps. Extreme Mechanics Letters 44, pp. 101215. Cited by: §III-C, §III-C.
  • [7] W. Park, S. Seo, and J. Bae (2018) A hybrid gripper with soft material and rigid structures. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 4 (1), pp. 65–72. Cited by: §I.
  • [8] L. Rosalia, B. W. Ang, and R. C. Yeow (2018) Geometry-based customization of bending modalities for 3d-printed soft pneumatic actuators. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3 (4), pp. 3489–3496. Cited by: §III-C.
  • [9] J. Santoso, E. H. Skorina, M. Salerno, S. de Rivaz, J. Paik, and C. D. Onal (2019)

    Single chamber multiple degree-of-freedom soft pneumatic actuator enabled by adjustable stiffness layers

    .
    Smart Materials and Structures 28 (3), pp. 035012. Cited by: §I.
  • [10] Y. Tang, Y. Chi, J. Sun, T. Huang, O. H. Maghsoudi, A. Spence, J. Zhao, H. Su, and J. Yin (2020) Leveraging elastic instabilities for amplified performance: spine-inspired high-speed and high-force soft robots. Science advances 6 (19), pp. eaaz6912. Cited by: §I.
  • [11] S. Timoshenko and S. Woinowsky-Krieger (1959) Theory of plates and shells. Cited by: §III-C.
  • [12] H. Wang, M. Totaro, and L. Beccai (2018) Toward perceptive soft robots: progress and challenges. Advanced Science 5 (9), pp. 1800541. Cited by: §I.
  • [13] J. Wang, Y. Fei, and W. Pang (2019) Design, modeling, and testing of a soft pneumatic glove with segmented pneunets bending actuators. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 24 (3), pp. 990–1001. Cited by: §III-C.
  • [14] W. Wang, C. Y. Yu, P. A. Abrego Serrano, and S. Ahn (2020) Shape memory alloy-based soft finger with changeable bending length using targeted variable stiffness. Soft robotics 7 (3), pp. 283–291. Cited by: §I.
  • [15] X. Wang, A. Khara, and C. Chen (2020) A soft pneumatic bistable reinforced actuator bioinspired by venus flytrap with enhanced grasping capability. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 15 (5), pp. 056017. Cited by: §II.
  • [16] X. Wang, H. Zhou, H. Kang, W. Au, and C. Chen (2021) Bio-inspired soft bistable actuator with dual actuations. Smart Materials and Structures. Cited by: §II.
  • [17] Z. Wang, P. Polygerinos, J. T. Overvelde, K. C. Galloway, K. Bertoldi, and C. J. Walsh (2016) Interaction forces of soft fiber reinforced bending actuators. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 22 (2), pp. 717–727. Cited by: §I.
  • [18] C. Yang, R. Kang, D. T. Branson, L. Chen, and J. S. Dai (2019) Kinematics and statics of eccentric soft bending actuators with external payloads. Mechanism and Machine Theory 139, pp. 526–541. Cited by: §I.
  • [19] H. K. Yap, H. Y. Ng, and C. Yeow (2016) High-force soft printable pneumatics for soft robotic applications. Soft Robotics 3 (3), pp. 144–158. Cited by: §III-A.
  • [20] H. Zhou, X. Wang, W. Au, H. Kang, and C. Chen (2021) Intelligent robots for fruit harvesting: recent developments and future challenges. Cited by: §I.
  • [21] H. Zhou, X. Wang, H. Kang, and C. Chen (2021) A tactile-enabled grasping method for robotic fruit harvesting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.09051. Cited by: §III-B.
  • [22] J. Zhou, S. Chen, and Z. Wang (2017) A soft-robotic gripper with enhanced object adaptation and grasping reliability. IEEE Robotics and automation letters 2 (4), pp. 2287–2293. Cited by: §I.
  • [23] J. Zhou, J. Yi, X. Chen, Z. Liu, and Z. Wang (2018) BCL-13: a 13-dof soft robotic hand for dexterous grasping and in-hand manipulation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3 (4), pp. 3379–3386. Cited by: §I.