Social choice rules driven by propositional logic

07/28/2011
by   Rosa Camps, et al.
0

Several rules for social choice are examined from a unifying point of view that looks at them as procedures for revising a system of degrees of belief in accordance with certain specified logical constraints. Belief is here a social attribute, its degrees being measured by the fraction of people who share a given opinion. Different known rules and some new ones are obtained depending on which particular constraints are assumed. These constraints allow to model different notions of choiceness. In particular, we give a new method to deal with approval-disapproval-preferential voting.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
03/27/2013

Rules, Belief Functions and Default Logic

This paper describes a natural framework for rules, based on belief func...
research
10/04/2018

Graph-Theoretic Analysis of Belief System Dynamics under Logic Constraints

Opinion formation cannot be modeled solely as an ideological deduction f...
research
04/05/2022

On an ecumenical natural deduction with stoup – Part I: The propositional case

Natural deduction systems, as proposed by Gentzen and further studied by...
research
05/15/2023

Deliberation and Voting in Approval-Based Multi-Winner Elections

Citizen-focused democratic processes where participants deliberate on al...
research
09/12/2017

Aggregating incoherent agents who disagree

In this paper, we explore how we should aggregate the degrees of belief ...
research
07/25/2012

Redundant Sudoku Rules

The rules of Sudoku are often specified using twenty seven all_different...
research
04/05/2023

Selecting Representative Bodies: An Axiomatic View

As the world's democratic institutions are challenged by dissatisfied ci...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset