Shellability is NP-complete

11/22/2017
by   Xavier Goaoc, et al.
0

We prove that for every d≥ 2, deciding if a pure, d-dimensional, simplicial complex is shellable is NP-hard, hence NP-complete. This resolves a question raised, e.g., by Danaraj and Klee in 1978. Our reduction also yields that for every d > 2 and k > 0, deciding if a pure, d-dimensional, simplicial complex is k-decomposable is NP-hard. For d > 3, both problems remain NP-hard when restricted to contractible pure d-dimensional complexes.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
10/14/2017

Netrunner Mate-in-1 or -2 is Weakly NP-Hard

We prove that deciding whether the Runner can win this turn (mate-in-1) ...
research
06/14/2018

Losing at Checkers is Hard

We prove computational intractability of variants of checkers: (1) decid...
research
08/25/2017

Embeddability in R^3 is NP-hard

We prove that the problem of deciding whether a 2- or 3-dimensional simp...
research
11/18/2019

Mapping NP-hard and NP-complete optimisation problems to Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimisation problems

We discuss several mappings from well-known NP-hard problems to Quadrati...
research
11/18/2019

Minimum Convex Partition of Point Sets is NP-Hard

Given a point set P, are k closed convex polygons sufficient to partitio...
research
04/25/2023

Simply Realising an Imprecise Polyline is NP-hard

We consider the problem of deciding, given a sequence of regions, if the...
research
07/28/2018

Team Diagonalization

Ten years ago, Glaßer, Pavan, Selman, and Zhang [GPSZ08] proved that if ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset